Spec URL: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-wadllib.spec SRPM URL: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-wadllib-1.3.3-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: A Python library to navigate HTTP resources using WADL files as guides. Fedora Account System Username: churchyard
The RPM package contains some txt files in site-packages and they are also identified as listed twice: /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/wadllib/NEWS.txt /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/wadllib/README.txt /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/wadllib/version.txt Installation might fail in mock because this package depends on python-larz-uri which is not available yet. Otherwise, it looks good to me. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package installs properly. Note: Installation errors (see attachment) See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ - Package does not contain duplicates in %files. Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/doc/python3-wadllib/README.txt See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/#_duplicate_files ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* GNU Lesser General Public License (v3)", "GNU Lesser General Public License (v3)". 20 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/lbalhar/temp/reviews/1752864-python-wadllib/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Installation errors ------------------- INFO: mock.py version 1.4.19 starting (python version = 3.7.4)... Start: init plugins INFO: selinux enabled Finish: init plugins INFO: Signal handler active Start: run Start: chroot init INFO: calling preinit hooks INFO: enabled root cache INFO: enabled dnf cache Start: cleaning dnf metadata Finish: cleaning dnf metadata INFO: enabled HW Info plugin Mock Version: 1.4.19 INFO: Mock Version: 1.4.19 Finish: chroot init INFO: installing package(s): /home/lbalhar/temp/reviews/1752864-python-wadllib/results/python3-wadllib-1.3.3-1.fc32.noarch.rpm ERROR: Command failed: # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ --releasever 32 --setopt=deltarpm=False --allowerasing --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk install /home/lbalhar/temp/reviews/1752864-python-wadllib/results/python3-wadllib-1.3.3-1.fc32.noarch.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-wadllib-1.3.3-1.fc32.noarch.rpm python-wadllib-1.3.3-1.fc32.src.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Source checksums ---------------- https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/w/wadllib/wadllib-1.3.3.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 1234cfe81e2cf223e56816f86df3aa18801d1770261865d93337b8b603be366e CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 1234cfe81e2cf223e56816f86df3aa18801d1770261865d93337b8b603be366e Requires -------- python3-wadllib (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) python3.8dist(lazr.uri) python3.8dist(setuptools) Provides -------- python3-wadllib: python-wadllib python3-wadllib python3.8dist(wadllib) python3dist(wadllib) Generated by fedora-review 0.7.2 (65d36bb) last change: 2019-04-09 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1752864 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic, Python Disabled plugins: Ocaml, Perl, fonts, Java, PHP, Haskell, R, SugarActivity, C/C++ Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
(In reply to Lumír Balhar from comment #1) > The RPM package contains some txt files in site-packages and they are also > identified as listed twice: > > /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/wadllib/NEWS.txt > /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/wadllib/README.txt > /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/wadllib/version.txt I've verified that version.txt and README.txt are used at runtime. Not sure about NEWS.txt, but it migth get used in next version. The files are kept and not marked as %doc. I've removed their duplicates. Spec URL: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-wadllib.spec SRPM URL: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-wadllib-1.3.3-1.fc30.src.rpm
Package approved
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-wadllib
FEDORA-2019-7fb253a20a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-7fb253a20a
breezy-3.0.1-1.fc31, python-launchpadlib-1.10.7-1.fc31, python-lazr-restfulclient-0.14.2-1.fc31, python-lazr-uri-1.0.3-1.fc31, python-sphinx-epytext-0.0.4-1.fc31, python-wadllib-1.3.3-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-7fb253a20a
breezy-3.0.1-1.fc31, python-launchpadlib-1.10.7-1.fc31, python-lazr-restfulclient-0.14.2-1.fc31, python-lazr-uri-1.0.3-1.fc31, python-sphinx-epytext-0.0.4-1.fc31, python-wadllib-1.3.3-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.