Description of problem: Please provide cross-binutils package for epel8.
*** Bug 1763547 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Will you be able to branch and build cross-binutils in epel8 and epel9? The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish to build it on epel8 and epel9. I just tested a local build in mock and it seems to build and work fine.
I (as an "admin") have no objection for EPEL Packagers SIG becoming a co-maintainer of the epel{8,9} branched.
I have added epel-packagers-sig as collaborator, but please coordinate any changes with the primary maintainers.
Thanks! Requested branches: $ fedpkg request-branch epel8 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/45800 $ fedpkg request-branch epel9 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/45801
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f390ca5d2b has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f390ca5d2b
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f390ca5d2b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f390ca5d2b See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-211d91e995 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-211d91e995
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f390ca5d2b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-211d91e995 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.