Bug 1757416 - Review Request: phosh - Graphical shell for mobile devices
Summary: Review Request: phosh - Graphical shell for mobile devices
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Robert-André Mauchin 🐧
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-10-01 13:15 UTC by Lubomir Rintel
Modified: 2019-10-03 14:27 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-10-03 14:27:09 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:
zebob.m: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Lubomir Rintel 2019-10-01 13:15:20 UTC
SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/phosh.spec
SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/phosh-0.1.0-1.fc31.src.rpm
mock: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37982319

Description:

Phosh is a simple shell for Wayland compositors speaking the layer-surface
protocol. It currently supports

* a lockscreen
* brightness control and nighlight
* the gcr system-prompter interface
* acting as a polkit auth agent
* enough of org.gnome.Mutter.DisplayConfig to make gnome-settings-daemon happy
* a homebutton that toggles a simple favorites menu
* status icons for battery, wwan and wifi

Comment 1 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2019-10-01 14:26:26 UTC
 - Valid license shorthand is GPLv3+:

License:        GPLv3+

 - You need to valudate the .desktop file:

BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils

[…]

%install
%meson_install
%find_lang %{name}
desktop-file-validate %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/sm.puri.Phosh.desktop



Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-
  file-validate if there is such a file.


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
     BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* GNU General Public
     License (v3)", "GPL (v3 or later)", "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect
     FSF address)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "NTP License (legal disclaimer)",
     "GNU Lesser General Public License (v2.1 or later)", "GNU Lesser
     General Public License (v2 or later)". 212 files have unknown license.
     Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/bob/packaging/review/phosh/review-phosh/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/share/locale/zh_Hans_CN/LC_MESSAGES,
     /usr/share/locale/zh_Hans_CN
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[-]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[?]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: phosh-0.1.0-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm
          phosh-debuginfo-0.1.0-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm
          phosh-debugsource-0.1.0-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm
          phosh-0.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm
phosh.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lockscreen -> lock screen, lock-screen, silkscreen
phosh.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nighlight -> nightlight, highlight, nigh light
phosh.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gcr -> gr, gar, crag
phosh.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US polkit -> pol kit, pol-kit, toolkit
phosh.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US auth -> auto, Ruth, author
phosh.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US DisplayConfig -> Configuration
phosh.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US homebutton -> home button, home-button, buttonhole
phosh.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wwan -> wean, wan, swan
phosh.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wifi -> wife, wiki, WiFi
phosh.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPL3+
phosh.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary phosh
phosh.x86_64: E: incorrect-locale-subdir /usr/share/locale/zh_Hans_CN/LC_MESSAGES/phosh.mo
phosh.x86_64: E: invalid-lc-messages-dir /usr/share/locale/zh_Hans_CN/LC_MESSAGES/phosh.mo
phosh-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPL3+
phosh-debugsource.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPL3+
phosh.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lockscreen -> lock screen, lock-screen, silkscreen
phosh.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nighlight -> nightlight, highlight, nigh light
phosh.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gcr -> gr, gar, crag
phosh.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US polkit -> pol kit, pol-kit, toolkit
phosh.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US auth -> auto, Ruth, author
phosh.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US DisplayConfig -> Configuration
phosh.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US homebutton -> home button, home-button, buttonhole
phosh.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wwan -> wean, wan, swan
phosh.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wifi -> wife, wiki, WiFi
phosh.src: W: invalid-license GPL3+
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 23 warnings.

Comment 2 Lubomir Rintel 2019-10-02 06:27:07 UTC
Thank you!

Updated package:

SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/phosh.spec
SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/phosh-0.1.0-2.fc31.src.rpm

Comment 3 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2019-10-02 19:55:48 UTC
Package approved.

Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2019-10-03 13:58:26 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/phosh

Comment 5 Lubomir Rintel 2019-10-03 14:27:09 UTC
Thank you very much Robert and Gwyn!

Imported and built.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.