Bug 1758884 - sshfs needs to be rebuilt for EPEL-8
Summary: sshfs needs to be rebuilt for EPEL-8
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: fuse-sshfs
Version: epel8
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Peter Lemenkov
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1755983 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-10-06 15:08 UTC by Scott Baker
Modified: 2020-10-27 22:54 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-10-27 22:54:37 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Scott Baker 2019-10-06 15:08:44 UTC
sshfs was present in EPEL-7 but is not present in EPEL-8.

Please build sshfs for EPEL-8

Comment 1 Dusty Mabe 2019-10-08 19:13:29 UTC
I worked around this for now by using the fuse-sshfs rpm from fedora 29:

```
sudo dnf install https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/fuse-sshfs/3.5.1/1.fc29/x86_64/fuse-sshfs-3.5.1-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm
```

Comment 2 Scott Baker 2019-10-08 23:05:37 UTC
I can confirm this work around works. Thanks for the tip.

Comment 3 Dusty Mabe 2019-10-21 00:59:48 UTC
*** Bug 1755983 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Peter Lemenkov 2020-02-28 13:39:57 UTC
I am not planning to maintain any packages for EPEL including this one so (co)maintainers are welcome.

Comment 5 Vasiliy Glazov 2020-03-08 16:51:06 UTC
You can add me as comaintainer.

Comment 6 Richard W.M. Jones 2020-03-08 17:39:38 UTC
You can also add me as comaintainer (FAS: rjones)

I will note here that I tried to have fuse-sshfs added to RHEL 8 (again -
I seem to request it for every RHEL).  Unfortunately my attempts were again
unsuccessful.  If you have access to private bugs then you can take a
look at bug 1682788 comments and links.

However it's in a bit of a weird state at the moment, where it's present
in internal RHEL 8 dist-git, and gets built for each minor release, but it's
blocked at the RCM level from being released.  I sincerely hope this doesn't
cause problems for adding it to EPEL 8.  In my view the real solution is to
release this component in base RHEL as it's a useful and oft-requested
package but as above I've so far been unsuccessful.

Comment 7 Peter Lemenkov 2020-03-09 10:56:01 UTC
(In reply to Vasiliy Glazov from comment #5)
> You can add me as comaintainer.

Done.

(In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #6)
> You can also add me as comaintainer (FAS: rjones)

Done

Comment 8 Vasiliy Glazov 2020-03-10 06:30:11 UTC
Since fuse-sshfs in CentOS PowerTools repo it can't be added in EPEL 8.

Comment 9 Richard W.M. Jones 2020-03-10 09:05:01 UTC
(In reply to Vasiliy Glazov from comment #8)
> Since fuse-sshfs in CentOS PowerTools repo it can't be added in EPEL 8.

I didn't know this was a thing.  If CentOS are maintaining it then
does it need to be added to EPEL?  Should we close the bug?

Comment 10 Alexander Korsunsky 2020-03-10 11:07:32 UTC
(In reply to Vasiliy Glazov from comment #8)
> Since fuse-sshfs in CentOS PowerTools repo it can't be added in EPEL 8.

I can't find fuse-sshfs in the CentOS PowerTools repo, `yum repo-pkgs PowerTools list | grep ssh` comes up empty for me. Could you please specify where I can find the fuse-sshfs package?

I would find that very strange, because the CentOS PowerTools repository is designed to be identical to the Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder repository. If the RHEL CodeReady repo doesn't have fuse-sshfs, then then CentOS PowerTools repo shouldn't have it either.


(In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #9)
> (In reply to Vasiliy Glazov from comment #8)
> > Since fuse-sshfs in CentOS PowerTools repo it can't be added in EPEL 8.
> 
> I didn't know this was a thing.  If CentOS are maintaining it then
> does it need to be added to EPEL?  Should we close the bug?

Please do not close it yet before you check that it is indeed available in CentOS 8.

I'm currently using the workaround of using the Fedora 28 package, but I would appreciate it if a real EPEL 8 package were available.

Comment 12 Alexander Korsunsky 2020-03-10 11:45:33 UTC
(In reply to Vasiliy Glazov from comment #11)
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8/PowerTools/x86_64/os/Packages/fuse-sshfs-2.
> 8-5.el8.x86_64.rpm

Thanks, now I got the package in CentOS 8.

Sorry for the confusion.

Comment 13 andrew 2020-03-13 12:25:11 UTC
And for RHEL users, turns out we don't need it in EPEL or from CentOS repos, because it's in RHEL: https://access.redhat.com/articles/4348511

$ sudo subscription-manager repos --enable codeready-builder-for-rhel-8-x86_64-rpms
Repository 'codeready-builder-for-rhel-8-x86_64-rpms' is enabled for this system.
$ sudo yum install fuse-sshfs
Updating Subscription Management repositories.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 for x86_64 - AppStream (RPMs)                  43 kB/s | 4.5 kB     00:00    
Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for RHEL 8 x86_64 (RPMs)                 5.4 MB/s | 2.9 MB     00:00    
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 for x86_64 - BaseOS (RPMs)                     33 kB/s | 4.1 kB     00:00    
Dependencies resolved.
=========================================================================================================
 Package           Architecture  Version           Repository                                       Size
=========================================================================================================
Installing:
 fuse-sshfs        x86_64        2.8-5.el8         codeready-builder-for-rhel-8-x86_64-rpms         56 k

Transaction Summary
=========================================================================================================
Install  1 Package

Total download size: 56 k
Installed size: 109 k
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
fuse-sshfs-2.8-5.el8.x86_64.rpm                                          119 kB/s |  56 kB     00:00    
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total                                                                    119 kB/s |  56 kB     00:00     
Running transaction check
Transaction check succeeded.
Running transaction test
Transaction test succeeded.
Running transaction
  Preparing        :                                                                                 1/1 
  Installing       : fuse-sshfs-2.8-5.el8.x86_64                                                     1/1 
  Running scriptlet: fuse-sshfs-2.8-5.el8.x86_64                                                     1/1 
  Verifying        : fuse-sshfs-2.8-5.el8.x86_64                                                     1/1 
Installed products updated.

Installed:
  fuse-sshfs-2.8-5.el8.x86_64                                                                            

Complete!

Comment 14 Dusty Mabe 2020-03-14 16:37:10 UTC
Well all of this is just about as confusing as it could possibly be.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.