Description of problem: Meeting invitation w/acceptance is added to calendar, but the acceptor shows up as "Needs Action", instead of "Accepted". The person who scheduled the appointment also doesn't have the acceptor changed to "Accepted", even though the mail arrived and update was selected. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): evolution-2.0.2-25 How reproducible: Always. At least, always with this machine. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Schedule a meeting on another machine, as a different user. Add the testing account to the meeting list, as required. Agree to the sending mail to let them know dialog. 2. Receive the message as the tester and invitee, and accept with sending an RSVP back. The new meeting will show up in your calendar, but you will still show as 'Needs Action'. 3. The inviter will get the mail saying you accepted, and will ask it to update their calendar, but you will still show up as 'Needs Action'. I have no idea if this is a regression, as it was not until this run through of U3 that I was able to test this portion of things effectively. I believe that it did work fine in RHEL3U7, however.
Ok, _this_ is weird. I just noticed that the meeting acceptances were showing up as coming from the organizer, not the invitee. And... while it's true that I have two accounts set up on the invitee's side with the organizer's name, both are disabled and the invitee's name is the default one. I'm going to check if completely removing the organizer's accounts from evo's mail makes things any less confused, although the fact that they are disabled makes this all very strange.
Hmm. Ok, this was either because of the above, or because I hadn't selected someone from my contacts in order to invite them, I just typed in enough of the address to be able to send mail. (eg, I typed 'zebra', rather than taking the address and adding to my address book, then adding an invitee by using the address book. This resulted in, once I took both disabled gazelles from the account list on zebra's side, gazelle's side saying the email reply came from 'An unknown person') If Evo can send mail, why would it get confused about who sent the reply? *baffled* This is almost certainly not a regression, although it _is_ utterly strange. Not necessarily because I had the same account name as some of the disabled accounts on the other end, but because it seems to not cope well with people invited to meetings who are not added from the contact list.
Changing to note x86_64 (specifically, a viper).
Interestingly, this behavior repeated yesterday with a i386, but worked as I'd have expected today on a x86_64 (with the most recent beta). Confused... not sure what I did differently. I... _think_ the one where it worked is the only case where I'd not ever set up an account as more than one person (ie, the two test accounts are zebra and gazelle that I tend to use for this, and the test machine has only ever been zebra - although both IMAP and POP - and never gazelle).
Evolution 2.0.2 is only being updated for security issues. Closing as WONTFIX.