Bug 1761772 - [Power9] Live migration - back/forth between RHEL-ALT 7.6-z, RHEL-AV 8.1.1 and RHEL-AV 8.2.0
Summary: [Power9] Live migration - back/forth between RHEL-ALT 7.6-z, RHEL-AV 8.1.1 an...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Advanced Virtualization
Classification: Red Hat
Component: qemu-kvm
Version: 8.2
Hardware: ppc64le
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Laurent Vivier
QA Contact: Gu Nini
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1779701
Blocks: 1771318
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-10-15 10:44 UTC by Gu Nini
Modified: 2020-06-15 05:49 UTC (History)
18 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-06-15 05:49:00 UTC
Type: Feature Request
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
ribarry: mirror+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Gu Nini 2019-10-15 10:44:28 UTC
Description of problem:

This is to track the "Live migration - back/forth between RHEL-ALT 7.6, RHEL-AV 8.1.1 and RHEL-AV 8.2.0 on Power9". Both pre-copy and post-copy live migration need to be tested and supported.

Following test matrix should be run:
    RHEL-ALT 7.6 with qemu-kvm-rhev to/from RHEL-AV 8.2.0
    RHEL-AV 8.1.1 with qemu-kvm-rhev to/from RHEL-AV 8.2.0 

The machine types coverage are: pseries-rhel7.5.0, pseries-rhel7.5.0-sxxm, pseries-rhel7.6.0, pseries-rhel7.6.0-sxxm, pseries-rhel8.0.0, pseries-rhel8.1.0
Please note machine types pseries-rhel8.0.0 and pseries-rhel8.1.0 would only be covered when both src and dst hosts are RHEL8 series.
      
Red Hat Layered Products: RHV and OSP, should review this BZ and specify which versions of RHEL host should be tested. And, prioritize the different combinations based on what customers will be using.

Comment 3 Ademar Reis 2020-02-05 23:07:16 UTC
QEMU has been recently split into sub-components and as a one-time operation to avoid breakage of tools, we are setting the QEMU sub-component of this BZ to "General". Please review and change the sub-component if necessary the next time you review this BZ. Thanks

Comment 4 xianwang 2020-02-06 07:09:13 UTC
(In reply to Gu Nini from comment #0)
> Description of problem:
> 
> This is to track the "Live migration - back/forth between RHEL-ALT 7.6,
> RHEL-AV 8.1.1 and RHEL-AV 8.2.0 on Power9". Both pre-copy and post-copy live
> migration need to be tested and supported.
> 
> Following test matrix should be run:
>     RHEL-ALT 7.6 with qemu-kvm-rhev to/from RHEL-AV 8.2.0
>     RHEL-AV 8.1.1 with qemu-kvm-rhev to/from RHEL-AV 8.2.0 
> 
> The machine types coverage are: pseries-rhel7.5.0, pseries-rhel7.5.0-sxxm,
> pseries-rhel7.6.0, pseries-rhel7.6.0-sxxm, pseries-rhel8.0.0,
> pseries-rhel8.1.0
> Please note machine types pseries-rhel8.0.0 and pseries-rhel8.1.0 would only
> be covered when both src and dst hosts are RHEL8 series.
>       
> Red Hat Layered Products: RHV and OSP, should review this BZ and specify
> which versions of RHEL host should be tested. And, prioritize the different
> combinations based on what customers will be using.

Bug verification:
I.RHEL-ALT 7.6 with qemu-kvm-rhev to/from RHEL-AV 8.2.0

Host A: ibm-p9b-11.pnr.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com
Host kernel: 4.18.0-167.el8.ppc64le
Guest kernel: 4.14.0-115.el7a.ppc64le
Qemu: qemu-kvm-4.2.0-4.module+el8.2.0+5220+e82621dc.ppc64le
SLOF: SLOF-20191022-1.git899d9883.module+el8.2.0+4793+b09dd2fb.noarch

Host B: ibm-p9b-23.pnr.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com
Host kernel: 4.14.0-115.8.2.el7a.ppc64le
Qemu: qemu-kvm-rhev-2.12.0-18.el7_6.7.ppc64le
SLOF: SLOF-20171214-2.gitfa98132.el7.noarch

Result: PASS
Jira link:
https://projects.engineering.redhat.com/browse/ELPPCKVM-1755


II.RHEL-AV 8.1.1 with qemu-kvm-rhev to/from RHEL-AV 8.2.0

Host A: ibm-p9b-11.pnr.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com
Host kernel: 4.18.0-167.el8.ppc64le
Guest kernel: 4.14.0-115.el7a.ppc64le
Qemu: qemu-kvm-4.2.0-4.module+el8.2.0+5220+e82621dc.ppc64le
SLOF: SLOF-20191022-1.git899d9883.module+el8.2.0+4793+b09dd2fb.noarch

Host B: ibm-p9b-21.pnr.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com
Host 4.18.0-147.3.1.el8_1.ppc64le
Qemu: qemu-kvm-4.1.0-19.module+el8.1.1+5172+e3ff58a1.ppc64le
SLOF: SLOF-20190703-1.gitba1ab360.module+el8.1.0+3730+7d905127.noarch

Result: PASS
Jira link:
https://projects.engineering.redhat.com/browse/ELPPCKVM-1756

III.Additional, we have test P9(rhelav810)<-->P9(rhelav820):rhel810-p9-guest

Host A: P9 RHELAV810
Host kernel: 4.18.0-147.el8.ppc64le
Guest kernel: kernel-4.18.0-147.4.1.el8_1
Qemu: qemu-kvm-4.1.0-14.module+el8.1.0+4754+8d38b36b.ppc64le
SLOF: SLOF-20190703-1.gitba1ab360.module+el8.1.0+3730+7d905127.noarch

Host B: P9 RHELAV820
Host kernel: 4.18.0-167.el8.ppc64le
Qemu: qemu-kvm-4.2.0-4.module+el8.2.0+5220+e82621dc.ppc64le
SLOF: SLOF-20191022-1.git899d9883.module+el8.2.0+4793+b09dd2fb.noarch


Result: PASS
Jira link:
https://projects.engineering.redhat.com/browse/ELPPCKVM-1762

So, this bug could be verify.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.