Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1764265 - Zypper commands do not run non-interactively on first attempt
Summary: Zypper commands do not run non-interactively on first attempt
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Subscription Management
Version: 6.5.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: 6.6.1
Assignee: Jiri Hnidek
QA Contact: jcallaha
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1785319
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-10-22 15:09 UTC by Dylan Gross
Modified: 2023-03-24 15:45 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1785319 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-12-11 16:08:49 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github candlepin subscription-manager pull 2185 0 'None' closed 1764265: Set gpgcheck to 0, when zypper is used; ENT-1758 2020-09-18 21:08:48 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2019:4217 0 None None None 2019-12-11 16:08:51 UTC

Internal Links: 1858231

Description Dylan Gross 2019-10-22 15:09:21 UTC
Description of problem:

   When zypper commands are run for the first time against Satellite-provided repos, subscription-manager prompts interactively to accept if the repo is unsigned. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

   Red Hat Satellite tools (i.e. subscription-manager + zypper plugins) for:
      SLES11 sp4
      SLES12
      SLES15

How reproducible:  Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.   Ensure cache is cleaned or first time executing
2.   Install a package from a non-redhat repo provided by Satellite using zypper

Actual results:

   Zypper plugin prompts interactively for acceptance of unsigned repo.

Expected results:

   Zypper can install without interactive prompts.   

Additional info:

   The suggestion is a client-side --override for the SLES client tools that can accept the repo, or answer an automatic yes to the prompt.

Comment 4 jcallaha 2019-12-10 20:47:39 UTC
Verified in latest builds of subman for sles.

11sp4: subscription-manager-1.25.11-7.sles11_4sat.subman_120.x86_64
12sp3: subscription-manager-1.25.20-3.sles12_3sat.x86_64
12sp4: subscription-manager-1.25.20-2.sles12_4sat.x86_64
15sp1: subscription-manager-1.25.20-1.sles15_1sat.x86_64

With the new change, there is no need to accept that Satellite repos are unsigned.
Example of the new repos:
[subscription-manager:Default_Organization_sles_11sp4]
name=11sp4
enabled=1
autorefresh=0
baseurl=https://my.sat.host.com/pulp/repos/Default_Organization/Library/11sp4/custom/sles/11sp4?ssl_verify=host&ssl_clientcert=%2Fetc%2Fpki%2Fentitlement%2F6514123076998026754.pem&ssl_clientkey=%2Fetc%2Fpki%2Fentitlement%2F6514123076998026754-key.pem&ssl_capath=%2Fetc%2Frhsm%2Fca
type=NONE
gpgcheck=0
service=subscription-manager

Note: While testing this bug, I encountered and filed this potentially related bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781887

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2019-12-11 16:08:49 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:4217


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.