This is needed for perl-Test-Trap. It builds OK if the BuildRequires on perl(Devel::Refcount) is removed, which is OK because the module now uses B instead of Devel::Refcount.
Emmanuel, could you take this one?
I've updated the dependencies and requested the epel8 branch. https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/19017 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/19018 Is there any reason this bug was assigned to kwizart? Given that I'm point of contact, I would expect it to be assigned to me.
(In reply to Emmanuel Seyman from comment #2) > Is there any reason this bug was assigned to kwizart? Given that I'm point > of contact, I would expect it to be assigned to me. That's what I thought when I raised it. Perhaps kwizart was the epel branch contact in pkgdb, back when you could have different points of contact for each branch? Bugzilla still seems to have a concept of "Fedora" and "Fedora EPEL" maintainers for each component but I don't know how to see who the EPEL contact is for a package. I would be nice if the per-branch contact (or at least per-product contact) functionality could be restored, so at least Ralf could be spared the EPEL requests for his packages.
FEDORA-EPEL-2019-8ac6d18036 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-8ac6d18036
perl-Test-Refcount-0.10-3.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-8ac6d18036
perl-Test-Refcount-0.10-3.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.