Bug 1766952 - [DDF] More detailed description could be added for 'Exclude pattern for facts stored in satellite' and 'Ignore
Summary: [DDF] More detailed description could be added for 'Exclude pattern for facts...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Documentation
Version: 6.6.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: Melanie Corr
QA Contact: Sergei Petrosian
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-10-30 11:04 UTC by Direct Docs Feedback
Modified: 2019-11-08 09:01 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-11-08 09:01:20 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Direct Docs Feedback 2019-10-30 11:04:29 UTC
More detailed description could be added for 'Exclude pattern for facts stored in satellite' and 'Ignore interfaces with matching identifier' items, particularly how the wildcards are expanded as they don't seem to work the traditional way. Please for more information see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759111

Reported by: qa

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_satellite/6.6/html/administering_red_hat_satellite/satellite-settings_assembly#annotations:069fe712-7c1e-4a7e-986b-d4438b921dba

Comment 1 Melanie Corr 2019-10-30 12:32:36 UTC
Thank you for opening this bug. I'll take a look.

Comment 2 Melanie Corr 2019-10-31 12:50:48 UTC
Hi Vladimir, 

Thank you for opening this bug. 

We have a section here where we have included information about search syntax. I think the idea behind a section like this was so it could be universally applicable to all of Satellite so that we could benefit everyone writing search queries etc. 

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_satellite/6.6/html/administering_red_hat_satellite/chap-red_hat_satellite-administering_red_hat_satellite-searching_and_bookmarking#sect-Red_Hat_Satellite-Administering_Red_Hat_Satellite-Query_Syntax

Do you think if I added some information here about using wildcards, with examples from this provisioning scenario, that it might be more helpful?

I appreciate you opening the BZ and bringing this to our attention. 

PS, in your comment in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759111 Peter V cannot see private comments.

Comment 3 Melanie Corr 2019-10-31 12:51:19 UTC
Forgot to raise needinfo on Vladimir

Comment 4 Vladimír Sedmík 2019-11-01 21:29:23 UTC
Hello Melanie,

the section you mentioned relates generally to the searchboxes and in these searchboxes wildcards work as expected. So generally yes, you can add some wildcards description and reuse it everywhere searchbox is referenced. However, in case of this BZ, I meant usage of wildcards in the two particular items under the Provisioning tab, which seem to be implemented in a different way. I'm sorry for being unclear in my initial comment and I hope it's more clear now. Please feel free to ping me in case of any doubts.

PS: Thank you for notice, I didn't realize Peter is not from RedHat.

Comment 5 Vladimír Sedmík 2019-11-01 21:33:53 UTC
ups, didn'ŧ wish to touch the whiteboard

Comment 8 Melanie Corr 2019-11-07 12:38:35 UTC
These changes are now live on the Customer Portal:

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_satellite/6.6/html/administering_red_hat_satellite/satellite-settings_assembly

Thanks,

Melanie

Comment 13 Melanie Corr 2019-11-08 09:01:20 UTC
These changes are now live on the Customer Portal:

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_satellite/6.6/html/administering_red_hat_satellite/satellite-settings_assembly

Thanks,

Melanie


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.