Bug 176758 – RFE: include bttv.h and usb-serial.h in kernel-devel

This service will be undergoing maintenance at 00:00 UTC, 2017-10-23 It is expected to last about 30 minutes

Bug 176758 - RFE: include bttv.h and usb-serial.h in kernel-devel

Summary:	RFE: include bttv.h and usb-serial.h in kernel-devel

Status:	CLOSED UPSTREAM

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	kernel (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Dave Jones
QA Contact:	Brian Brock
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:	FutureFeature

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2006-01-01 14:00 EST by Ville Skyttä
Modified:	2015-01-04 17:24 EST (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-01-02 23:58:32 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Ship bttv.h and usb-serial.h (1011 bytes, patch) 2006-01-01 14:00 EST, Ville Skyttä	no flags	Details \| Diff
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Ville Skyttä 2006-01-01 14:00:06 EST

I was wondering if the following headers could be included in future
kernel-devel packages:

- media/video/bttv.h, needed by LIRC's gpio dependent drivers
- usb/serial/usb-serial.h, needed by Gnokii's Nokia DKU-2 USB cable driver

Untested (because a FC devel CVS checkout doesn't seem to result in a buildable
setup) patch attached.

Comment 1 Ville Skyttä 2006-01-01 14:00:06 EST

Created attachment 122674 [details]
Ship bttv.h and usb-serial.h

Comment 2 Dave Jones 2006-01-02 23:58:32 EST

These out-of-tree modules really should be campaigning for upstream to move
these to include/.  The dvb stuff that was in the spec should also be doing the
same (fwiw, that's now been removed too).

We have to take this stand otherwise over time we'll accumulate more and more of
these special cases, and things become a real mess.  If a subsystem has an api
it wants out-of-tree modules to build against, it needs to make it visible.

Comment 3 Ville Skyttä 2006-01-03 12:17:09 EST

Fair enough, thanks for the info.  Removing the dvb stuff clarifies things too.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.