Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

The FDP team is no longer accepting new bugs in Bugzilla. Please report your issues under FDP project in Jira. Thanks.

Bug 1768347

Summary:	[RFE] Support IPv6 NAT for dnat_and_snat
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux Fast Datapath	Reporter:	Numan Siddique <nusiddiq>
Component:	ovn2.11	Assignee:	Numan Siddique <nusiddiq>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Jianlin Shi <jishi>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	FDP 20.A	CC:	ctrautma, kfida
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-01-21 17:02:44 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Numan Siddique 2019-11-04 07:06:23 UTC

Description of problem:

Presently  IPv6 NAT is not support for N/S traffic. This is required for openshift usecases.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Numan Siddique 2019-11-05 10:16:42 UTC

The feature is availablein 2.11.1-12 FDN.

It should be available in the next FDP release for layered products.

Comment 3 Jianlin Shi 2019-12-24 01:47:06 UTC

test ipv6 snat, dnat and dnat_and_snat, all passed: https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/recipes/7706668#task103850192

set VERIFIED

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2020-01-21 17:02:44 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:0190