Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1768387

Summary:	Missing event for auto attached WGT ISO
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager	Reporter:	Petr Matyáš <pmatyas>
Component:	rhvm-setup-plugins	Assignee:	Liran Rotenberg <lrotenbe>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Tamir <tamir>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	4.3.7	CC:	lsurette, michal.skrivanek, rbarry
Target Milestone:	ovirt-4.4.0
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-11-05 07:46:17 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	Virt	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1730538
Bug Blocks:

Description Petr Matyáš 2019-11-04 10:03:04 UTC

Description of problem:
Now that we have auto attached CDs in VMs there is no way the user will now this happened other than checking the VM itself and its attached CDs.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rhvm-setup-plugins-4.3.5-1.el7ev.noarch

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. have Win VM with older WGT ISO installed
2. have newest WGT ISO available on ISO domain
3. stop and start Win VM

Actual results:
newest WGT ISO is attached but there is no event for this

Expected results:
there is a regular event same as manual cd change

Additional info:
regular event format:
CD RHV-toolsSetup_4.3_7.iso was inserted to VM w10 by admin@internal-authz.

Comment 1 Michal Skrivanek 2019-11-05 07:46:17 UTC

there is no event for anything like that. That's not a bug, there never has been anything like that
Given the fact that we plan to stop doing that in future it's not worth adding anyway

Comment 2 Petr Matyáš 2019-11-05 08:47:35 UTC

(In reply to Michal Skrivanek from comment #1)
> Given the fact that we plan to stop doing that in future it's not worth
> adding anyway

Oh, it's cool that this was only recently added (fixed) :D