Bug 176919 - rpmbuild: rpmio.c:2863: Fdopen: Assertion `fd && fd->magic == 0x04463138' failed
rpmbuild: rpmio.c:2863: Fdopen: Assertion `fd && fd->magic == 0x04463138' failed
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: rpm (Show other bugs)
x86_64 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Paul Nasrat
Mike McLean
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2006-01-04 07:18 EST by Dave Mitchell
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-01-19 15:43:15 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Dave Mitchell 2006-01-04 07:18:46 EST
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050922 Fedora/1.0.7-1.1.fc4 Firefox/1.0.7

Description of problem:
While trying to build a development version of ghostscript (required by another package):

# rpmbuild --rebuild http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/SRPMS/ghostscript-8.15.1-3.1.src.rpm
Installing http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/SRPMS/ghostscript-8.15.1-3.1.src.rpm
rpmbuild: rpmio.c:2863: Fdopen: Assertion `fd && fd->magic == 0x04463138' failed.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
as above

Actual Results:  as above

Expected Results:  shouldn't have died with assertion failure

Additional info:
Comment 1 Jeff Johnson 2006-01-06 06:37:55 EST

So do this instead
    rpm -ivh http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/SRPMS/
    rpmbuild -bb /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/ghostscript.spec
Comment 2 Dave Mitchell 2006-01-10 16:41:23 EST
So, because there happens to be a workaround, the fact that rpmbuild fails an
internal assertion isn't a bug ???
Comment 3 Jeff Johnson 2006-01-19 15:43:15 EST
Yes, you have a workaround, use that instead.

Deferred until whenever (if that floats your boat instead).

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.