Bug 176950 - wxGTK support for databases (wxODBC) missing
Summary: wxGTK support for databases (wxODBC) missing
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: wxGTK
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matthew Miller
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: FutureFeature, Reopened
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-01-04 17:14 UTC by Nicola Soranzo
Modified: 2009-07-02 12:58 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

(edit)
Clone Of:
(edit)
Last Closed: 2007-04-15 17:26:15 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Nicola Soranzo 2006-01-04 17:14:40 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; it-IT; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050922 Fedora/1.0.7-1.1.fc4 Firefox/1.0.7

Description of problem:
The wxWidgets/GTK toolkit has a class for database abstraction via ODBC, but this class is not included in the package. It'd be nice to have it, maybe in a separate subpackage.

To compile the class --with-odbc should be added to configure.
Also it requires unixODBC (or iODBC, but iODBC is neither in Core nor in Extras).


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Compile a wxGTK program that need the ODBC classes.


Actual Results:  The program is compiled, but linking fails.

Additional info:

Class documentation:
http://www.wxwidgets.org/manuals/2.6.2/wx_odbcoverview.html

Other information here:
http://wiki.wxwidgets.org/wiki.pl?ODBC

Comment 1 Matthew Miller 2006-01-04 18:40:15 UTC
Sounds reasonable, especially since unixODBC is right there in core.

Comment 2 Matthew Miller 2006-02-06 17:27:08 UTC
I'd like some opinions from people on whether this should be a subpackage or
integrated into the main RPM. I don't want to have a crazed profusion of
subpackages (especially when the prereqs are something that reasonably can be
expected to be on the system of someone who might want wxGTK). But does unixODBC
warrant an exception?

Comment 3 Nicola Soranzo 2006-03-15 13:17:14 UTC
Matthew, is wxGTK 2.6.3 going out with or without wxODBC?

Comment 4 Matthew Miller 2006-03-15 13:31:29 UTC
I was thinking I'd add it at that point, probably as a subpackage.

Comment 5 Matthew Miller 2006-03-21 19:46:23 UTC
Currently with rc2, I get this build failure:


./src/common/db.cpp: In member function 'bool wxDb::Open(const wxString&, void*,
 bool)':
./src/common/db.cpp:848: error: ambiguous overload for 'operator=' in '((wxDb*)t
his)->wxDb::outConnectionStr = outConnectBuffer'


(Haven't investigated at all; just got that error and figured I'd mention it
here in case someone wants to jump in with a known fix.)

Comment 6 Matthew Miller 2006-03-21 19:49:33 UTC
Hmmm, okay -- quick googling indicates that this is a problem with wxODBC and
Unicode, or at least was in 2004.

Comment 7 Matthew Miller 2006-03-21 20:01:03 UTC
Talking to myself.... here's the upstream bug:

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=109863&aid=1163141&group_id=9863

Comment 8 Matthew Miller 2006-04-13 21:11:33 UTC
Building in Fedora Extras devel. Since it's currently broken and has been for so
long, I'll build for FC5 as soon as I hear positive feedback or on Monday,
whichever comes first.

Comment 9 Matthew Miller 2006-04-19 02:56:27 UTC
Comment #8 is misplaced; sorry. Please ignore that; this is still waiting on the
upstream bug.

I'm going to mark this deferred for now. If someone comes up with a fix, please
give me a jab and I'll revisit. Thanks!

Comment 10 Matthew Miller 2007-04-15 16:58:52 UTC
Upstream bug not marked as fixed, but trying again with version 2.8.3 just to see.

Comment 11 Matthew Miller 2007-04-15 17:26:15 UTC
Still broken upstream.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.