Hi, I would be interested in there being an EPEL8 version of mcrypto.
Steve, would you maintain it?
Hi Miro, Yes I can maintain for sure : i.d: stevetraylen
Created attachment 1633941 [details] rhe8 spec file diff The .spec diff for epel8 seems to be something like.
I don't want the Python 2 subpackage restored at all.
I'm already planning on adding epel8 for m2crypto, as I need it for things myself, but at the moment, epel8 is kind of broken: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8977
After a bit more testing today I realise I am interested in epel6 and 7 as well. Will continue to test.
> I don't want the Python 2 subpackage restored at all. I am only interested in python3, in fact it would make my life easier if only 3.
Created attachment 1634799 [details] diff of master spec to allow build on epel 6 , 7 and 8 Diff to master branch to allow build on epel 6 , 7 and 8.
With the latest patch it builds in mock with all tests and installs within mock for epel 6, 7 and 8. Well almost. For EPEL6 we need a python34-typing package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770739
FEDORA-EPEL-2019-5b2b4b4b20 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-5b2b4b4b20
I will not be adding EPEL6/EPEL7, as the `m2crypto` source package exists in EL6 and EL7. If you want that, you'll need to make your own package for it.
m2crypto-0.35.2-5.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-5b2b4b4b20
m2crypto-0.35.2-5.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Hi Neal, Thanks for the 8 build. > as the `m2crypto` source package exists in EL6 and EL7. Yes, indeed my bad. I had in my mind m2crypto was something we had added locally and not got from RHEL. Adding a reference for benefit of ticket - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772387 thanks again.