Description of problem: Extracted from from email to cluster-list from Shinya Takagi, 1/10/06: Need an explanation of logic for split-brain syndrome with RHCS4 "...As all we know, RHCS4 doesn't have network tiebreaker anymore especially 4 or more nodes. Then, how application (in this case. cman is...I guess) will detect to be a master node and what kind of logic are following to be a master node ? And I wonder which node will become the master node if 2 and 2 split brain syndrome was occurred in 4 node cluster system. Is that same logic as 2-node cluster, which is basically faster node to be able to contact to fencing device (very primitive way :-) ) ? In RHEL3 CS, each node has a "map" who is a master and always being compared. So that if split brain was occurred, voting to other nodes and decided which one will be fenced. Does it RHCS3 and RHCS4 are used all same logic for fencing ?..." Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rh-cs(EN)-4-HTML-RHI (2005-11-30T16:52) and rh-cs(EN)-4-Print-RHI (2005-11-30T16:52) How reproducible: N/A Steps to Reproduce: N/A 1. 2. 3. Actual results: N/A Expected results: N/A Additional info: none
NEEDINFO_ENG has been deprecated in favor of NEEDINFO or ASSIGNED. Changing status to ASSIGNED for ENG review.
Unless there is a defect in the cluster software, there is no possiblity of a split-brain cluster. However, the concept of split-brain is covered in RHCS4 overview doc.