Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

For bugs related to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 product line. The current stable release is 4.9. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and above, please visit Red Hat JIRA https://issues.redhat.com/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa?pid=12332745 to report new issues.

Bug 177450

Summary:	gcj -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage fails
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4	Reporter:	Stan Cox <scox>
Component:	gcc4	Assignee:	Jakub Jelinek <jakub>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	4.0	CC:	aoliva
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-06-20 15:52:49 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	173278

Description Stan Cox 2006-01-10 20:00:27 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050922 Fedora/1.0.7-1.1.fc4 Firefox/1.0.7

Description of problem:
coverage.c gets a SIGSEGV at runtime because it uses types from build_common_tree_nodes (e.g. unsigned_type_node) from tree.h whereas the java types are defined in java-tree.h.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.gcj -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage hello.java
2.
3.
  

Actual Results:  SIGSEGV

Expected Results:  produce executable which works with gcov

Additional info:

Comment 7 Jakub Jelinek 2006-05-12 09:07:13 UTC

This is fixed in rawhide gcc-4.1.0-13 and above (and in RHEL4 U4
gcc4-4.1.0-15.EL4 and FC5 gcc-4.1.0-15.fc5).

Comment 8 Jiri Pallich 2012-06-20 15:52:49 UTC

Thank you for submitting this issue for consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux. The release for which you requested us to review is now End of Life. 
Please See https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/

If you would like Red Hat to re-consider your feature request for an active release, please re-open the request via appropriate support channels and provide additional supporting details about the importance of this issue.