Bug 1775685 - [vsphere] [upi] [ci] - statefulset test failures
Summary: [vsphere] [upi] [ci] - statefulset test failures
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1776773
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Storage
Version: 4.3.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.4.0
Assignee: aos-storage-staff@redhat.com
QA Contact: Liang Xia
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2019-11-22 14:57 UTC by Joseph Callen
Modified: 2019-12-02 15:47 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2019-12-02 15:47:56 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Joseph Callen 2019-11-22 14:57:09 UTC
Description of problem:

Failing tests:

[sig-apps] StatefulSet [k8s.io] Basic StatefulSet functionality [StatefulSetBasic] should adopt matching orphans and release non-matching pods [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]
[sig-apps] StatefulSet [k8s.io] Basic StatefulSet functionality [StatefulSetBasic] should not deadlock when a pod's predecessor fails [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]
[sig-apps] StatefulSet [k8s.io] Basic StatefulSet functionality [StatefulSetBasic] should perform rolling updates and roll backs of template modifications with PVCs [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]
[sig-apps] StatefulSet [k8s.io] Basic StatefulSet functionality [StatefulSetBasic] should provide basic identity [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]

Not sure these are related to above ^
[sig-storage] PVC Protection Verify "immediate" deletion of a PVC that is not in active use by a pod [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]
[sig-storage] PVC Protection Verify that PVC in active use by a pod is not removed immediately [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]
[sig-storage] PVC Protection Verify that scheduling of a pod that uses PVC that is being deleted fails and the pod becomes Unschedulable [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]


Or related to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699820

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

Comment 2 Maciej Szulik 2019-12-02 15:16:26 UTC
The repeating message from the failures:

"pod has unbound immediate PersistentVolumeClaims"

points at storage team, and from what I'm looking at code this is where this is stuck. I'll move accordingly for proper investigation.

Comment 3 Jan Safranek 2019-12-02 15:47:56 UTC
Indeed, dup of #1776773

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1776773 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.