Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 177735 - can't enable firewall within installer
can't enable firewall within installer
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: anaconda (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Anaconda Maintenance Team
Mike McLean
: Security
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2006-01-13 11:52 EST by Alexandre Oliva
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-01-13 13:17:39 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Alexandre Oliva 2006-01-13 11:52:33 EST
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20060103 Fedora/1.5-4 Firefox/1.5

Description of problem:
I dispute the wisdom of enabling boxes to be installed and booted up before the firewall can be set up in firstboot.  I can see that in some cases this might be what you want, but most often you should boot the box up already secure the first time.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Install (no question asked about firewall or selinux any more)
2.Boot system up
3.Leave firstboot run unattended

Actual Results:  You have a number of services running without anything to protect them until you get to answer the firstboot prompt.

Expected Results:  Machine should be safe when it first boots up.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Chris Lumens 2006-01-13 13:17:39 EST
When anaconda is done, you have SELinux set in enforcing mode and basically all
ports but SSH closed.  I say basically all because CUPS and mDNS are also open,
though you can't close those no matter what you do with the current
implementation of system-config-securitylevel (I have plans to fix that). 
firstboot is really only giving you the opportunity to open more stuff up, as
the defaults are pretty strict now.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.