Description of problem: This bug is clone of https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1852807 upstream How reproducible: whenever you have the deployment with config_Drive= true with vfat as driver type or you use the testcase with instance deployed with ephemeral disk Steps to reproduce 1. deploy an instance with one already added vdb volume attached(Like I have used config drive format vfat that already took vdb volume) 2. run this testcase tempest.api.compute.volumes.test_attach_volume.AttachVolumeTestJSON.test_attach_detach_volume 3. This will fail in assertNotIn mismatch error like below as it tries to validate that vdb is detached or not which is set by libvirt assumption Actual results: Testcase failed Expected results: Testcase should have passed Additional info: Please look on this detailed upstream bug : https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1852807
I have added the partial fix: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/694636/ , there are couple more scenario test that needs some tuning [1] https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/887f99a288c1d2bef45356c916b317d37828e6ac/tempest/scenario/test_stamp_pattern.py#L101 [2] https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/67e07786189661151c73263a13a523865770bdde/tempest/scenario/test_minimum_basic.py#L71 as they both are also depend on volume_device_name params which is based on assumption.
Hi Paras, I see your patch got merged, thanks for the contribution. Are you going to also have a look on the other scenario tests you mentioned that need some tuning?
Hi Martin, Yes I will plan on working on them later after this week!
Hi Paras, that's great! Thanks. I'm gonna assign this BZ to you then, if you need any help (reviewing, getting the fixes to a release, etc), let me know.
moving to POST as the changes are merged upstream
*** Bug 1827347 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 1812908 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
The Fixed in version package contains both fixes of this issue. My testing concluded the same. The Fixed in version package is included in a latest puddle available in the RHOS 16.1 repository.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.1.3 bug fix and enhancement advisory), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2020:5413