Description of problem: According to more restrictive libdb licence policy exists effort to remove libdb's dependencies. apr-util package is now built with libdb requirement, this package could be build without libdb (configure --without-berkeley-db). libdb coud be replaced by gdbm or SQLite(configure --with-sqlite3=DIR). Actual results: apr-util requires libdb package Expected results: run without libdb
apr-util's DBM interface (apr_dbm.h) can use a variety of backends and currently defaults to Berkeley DB, although SDBM is also supported. Switching the default from BDB to SDBM - and dropping BDB support, is possible, though it might be disruptive for consumers of the DBM interface. Do you have a target Fedora release for which this is intended? Possibly we could look at supporting e.g. LMDB through this interface as a better alternative to SDBM.
In the best case it should be Fedora 32 or at least Fedora 33.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle. Changing version to 32.
We would like to move a step forward by getting rid of libdb. So I would like to ask, which problems do you see with changing backend from BDB to some other database? I want to summarize as much as possible problems with this change across components, so we can find the best possible solution.
Lubos is working on this, seeing if we can switch to LMDB. This one is in progress.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '32'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 32 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Fedora 32 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2021-05-25. Fedora 32 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 36 development cycle. Changing version to 36.
Is there any progress? May I help somehow?
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 38 development cycle. Changing version to 38.