Bug 178008 - Public key for xml-common-0.6.3-17.noarch.rpm is not installed
Public key for xml-common-0.6.3-17.noarch.rpm is not installed
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: sgml-common (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Archit Shah
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2006-01-17 05:35 EST by Abdul
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-01-26 11:44:01 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Abdul 2006-01-17 05:35:30 EST
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)

Description of problem:
First of all notice the difference in  name between bugzilla and repo. (xml-commons vs xml-common).

Second this is the output of yum:

Downloading Packages:
warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID db42a60e
Public key for xml-common-0.6.3-17.noarch.rpm is not installed
Retrieving GPG key from file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora
GPG key at file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora (0x4F2A6FD2) is already installed

The GPG keys listed for the "Fedora Core 4 - i386 - Base" repository are already installed but they are not correct for this package.
Check that the correct key URLs are configured for this repository.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1.yum install xml-to

Actual Results:  Public key for xml-common-0.6.3-17.noarch.rpm is not installed

Expected Results:  Public should be there

Additional info:
Comment 1 Archit Shah 2006-01-26 11:44:01 EST
xml-common is a subpackage of sgml-common, while xml-commons is an unrelated
package. The GPG problem can be worked around by running "rpm --import

This problem was discussed extensively here:


Other packages have encountered the same problem (e.g. bug160898, bug161786,
bug162302, bug162301, bug160436)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.