Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinx-copybutton/python-sphinx-copybutton.spec SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinx-copybutton/python-sphinx-copybutton-0.2.6-1.fc32.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: jjames Description: Sphinx-copybutton does one thing: add a little "copy" button to the right of your code blocks. If the code block overlaps to the right of the text area, you can just click the button to get the whole thing.
1. Subpackage doc must require main package with license file.
Thank you, Vasiliy. The doc subpackage does not actually need the main package, so instead I have added the LICENSE file to the subpackage. New URLs: Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinx-copybutton/python-sphinx-copybutton.spec SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinx-copybutton/python-sphinx-copybutton-0.2.6-2.fc32.src.rpm
OK. I will finish review tomorrow.
Approved. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for licenses manually. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep Note: Cannot find any build in BUILD directory (--prebuilt option?) [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python3-sphinx-copybutton [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-sphinx-copybutton-0.2.6-2.fc32.noarch.rpm python-sphinx-copybutton-doc-0.2.6-2.fc32.noarch.rpm python-sphinx-copybutton-0.2.6-2.fc32.src.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- python-sphinx-copybutton-doc.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://sphinx-copybutton.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> python3-sphinx-copybutton.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://sphinx-copybutton.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/choldgraf/sphinx-copybutton/archive/a335f3ee70bcdf442204ead0c95f48a39ea70097/sphinx-copybutton-a335f3e.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 116a1a83555cc2489fc9645e248416bd8317edf9e4045b9dc5c7a1cccb35d3e5 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 116a1a83555cc2489fc9645e248416bd8317edf9e4045b9dc5c7a1cccb35d3e5 Requires -------- python3-sphinx-copybutton (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) python3.8dist(sphinx) python-sphinx-copybutton-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- python3-sphinx-copybutton: python-sphinx-copybutton python3-sphinx-copybutton python3.8dist(sphinx-copybutton) python3dist(sphinx-copybutton) python-sphinx-copybutton-doc: python-sphinx-copybutton-doc Generated by fedora-review 0.7.3 (44b83c7) last change: 2019-09-18 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1780426 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-{{ target_arch }} Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Python Disabled plugins: PHP, Java, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, C/C++, Haskell, R, fonts Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
Thank you very much for the review, Vasiliy!
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-sphinx-copybutton
FEDORA-2019-6f877b61a6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6f877b61a6
python-sphinx-copybutton-0.2.6-2.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6f877b61a6
python-sphinx-copybutton-0.2.6-2.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.