RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1781454 - [rhel-8.2][RDMA] package dependency issue after merge infiniband-diags into rdma-core
Summary: [rhel-8.2][RDMA] package dependency issue after merge infiniband-diags into r...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: rdma-core
Version: 8.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
urgent
Target Milestone: rc
: 8.2
Assignee: Honggang LI
QA Contact: Afom T. Michael
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1723598 1783446
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-12-10 03:48 UTC by Honggang LI
Modified: 2023-03-07 12:32 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: rdma-core-26.0-5.el8
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-04-28 16:57:33 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
pm-rhel: mirror+

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-30914 0 None None None 2023-03-07 12:32:53 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2020:1865 0 None None None 2020-04-28 16:57:51 UTC

Description Honggang LI 2019-12-10 03:48:09 UTC 
Description of problem:

https://rpmdiff.engineering.redhat.com/run/425111/20/

NEEDS INSPECTION 	rdma-core-devel 	

Subpackage rdma-core-devel on i686 consumes libraries libibmad.so.5 libibnetdisc.so.5 from subpackage infiniband-diags but does not have explicit package version requirement.
Please add Requires: infiniband-diags = %{version}-%{release} to rdma-core-devel in the specfile to avoid the need to test interoperability between the various combinations of old and new subpackages.


NEEDS INSPECTION 	infiniband-diags 	

Subpackage infiniband-diags on i686 consumes libraries libibumad.so.3 libibumad.so.3(IBUMAD_1.0) libibumad.so.3(IBUMAD_1.1) from subpackage libibumad but does not have explicit package version requirement.
Please add Requires: libibumad = %{version}-%{release} to infiniband-diags in the specfile to avoid the need to test interoperability between the various combinations of old and new subpackages.


NEEDS INSPECTION 	rdma-core-devel 	

Subpackage rdma-core-devel on aarch64 x86_64 ppc64le s390x consumes libraries libibmad.so.5()(64bit) libibnetdisc.so.5()(64bit) from subpackage infiniband-diags but does not have explicit package version requirement.
Please add Requires: infiniband-diags = %{version}-%{release} to rdma-core-devel in the specfile to avoid the need to test interoperability between the various combinations of old and new subpackages.


NEEDS INSPECTION 	infiniband-diags 	

Subpackage infiniband-diags on aarch64 x86_64 ppc64le s390x consumes libraries libibumad.so.3()(64bit) libibumad.so.3(IBUMAD_1.0)(64bit) libibumad.so.3(IBUMAD_1.1)(64bit) from subpackage libibumad but does not have explicit package version requirement.
Please add Requires: libibumad = %{version}-%{release} to infiniband-diags in the specfile to avoid the need to test interoperability between the various combinations of old and new subpackages.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Honggang LI 2019-12-11 12:52:16 UTC 
*** Bug 1782173 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Nathan Scott 2019-12-11 20:01:10 UTC 
Hi Hongang,

Can you provide a timeframe for this to be fixed please?  This is blocking an urgent PCP update for RHEL 8.2.  Alternatively, is there a workaround I can use within the pcp spec file temporarily, perhaps adding a build dep on infiniband-diags or something like that?

Many thanks!
Comment 3 Honggang LI 2019-12-12 00:39:17 UTC 
(In reply to Nathan Scott from comment #2)
> Hi Hongang,
> 
> Can you provide a timeframe for this to be fixed please? 

I had a scratch build of rdma-core in last night. It should be fixed in today.
Comment 5 Honggang LI 2019-12-12 02:12:35 UTC 
(In reply to Honggang LI from comment #3)
> (In reply to Nathan Scott from comment #2)
> > Hi Hongang,
> > 
> > Can you provide a timeframe for this to be fixed please? 
> 
> I had a scratch build of rdma-core in last night. It should be fixed in
> today.

Issue should be fixed with rdma-core-26.0-5.el8. If you have any problem with rdma-core, please let me know.
Comment 6 Nathan Scott 2019-12-13 03:48:21 UTC 
(In reply to Honggang LI from comment #5)
> [...]
> Issue should be fixed with rdma-core-26.0-5.el8. If you have any problem
> with rdma-core, please let me know.

Thanks Honggang.  Only issue so far is it doesn't appear to be available in the build root yet, so the pcp build still fails - I guess that will change soon though now.

Thanks for the quick response!
Comment 7 Afom T. Michael 2020-01-28 23:02:48 UTC 
rdma-core.spec of rdma-core-26.0-5 vs older shows for infiniband-diags, "Requires: libibumad = %{version}-%{release}" is added.

In rdma-core.spec of rdma-core-26.0-5.el8.src.rpm has the following:
    %package -n infiniband-diags
    Summary: InfiniBand Diagnostic Tools
    Requires: libibumad = %{version}-%{release}


diff between rdma-core.spec of rdma-core-26.0-4.el8.src.rpm & rdma-core-26.0-5.el8.src.rpm has:
    %package -n infiniband-diags
     Summary: InfiniBand Diagnostic Tools
    +Requires: libibumad = %{version}-%{release}
Comment 8 Afom T. Michael 2020-02-04 21:58:38 UTC 
Moving to verified. rdma-core-26.0-5.el8.src.rpm and later spec file, rdma-core-devel section has these required dependencies as shown below.

$ grep -A 34 "^%package devel" ./rdma-core-26.0.5/rdma-core.spec | grep -E "^Requires: infiniband-diags|^Requires: libibumad"
Requires: libibumad = %{version}-%{release}
Requires: infiniband-diags = %{version}-%{release} 
$
$ rpm --query --requires ./rdma-core-devel-26.0-7.el8.x86_64.rpm | grep -E "libibumad = |infiniband-diags = "
infiniband-diags = 26.0-7.el8
libibumad = 26.0-7.el8
$ rpm --query --requires ./rdma-core-devel-26.0-7.el8.aarch64.rpm | grep -E "libibumad = |infiniband-diags = "
infiniband-diags = 26.0-7.el8
libibumad = 26.0-7.el8
$ rpm --query --requires ./rdma-core-devel-26.0-7.el8.i686.rpm | grep -E "libibumad = |infiniband-diags = "
infiniband-diags = 26.0-7.el8
libibumad = 26.0-7.el8
$ rpm --query --requires ./rdma-core-devel-26.0-7.el8.ppc64le.rpm | grep -E "libibumad = |infiniband-diags = "
infiniband-diags = 26.0-7.el8
libibumad = 26.0-7.el8
$ rpm --query --requires ./rdma-core-devel-26.0-7.el8.s390x.rpm | grep -E "libibumad = |infiniband-diags = "
infiniband-diags = 26.0-7.el8
libibumad = 26.0-7.el8
$
Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2020-04-28 16:57:33 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2020:1865
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.