Description of problem: Both "local storage operator" and "local volume operator" are used, which can confuse customer. We should consistently use "local storage operator". Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.4.0-0.nightly-2019-12-14-103510 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install local storage operator. 2. Check several pages for the installed local storage operator. Actual results: Some times "local storage operator" is used, while some times "local volume operator" is used. Expected results: Consistently use "local storage operator".
There is confusion about Local Storage Operator (the operator itself) and Local Volume operator APIs (the CRD / CRs managed by the operator). I propose using Local Volumes (without "operator") for the CRD / CRs. I.e. Local Storage Operator provides Local Volume API and don't use "operator" anywhere in the API.
Verified the issue is fixed with, Local Storage 4.4.0-202001062016 OpenShift Version 4.4.0-0.nightly-2020-01-06-072200
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:0581