rhpl has absolutely *no* documentation whatsoever. Not even docstrings. This inhibits use of the library in second- or third-party tools and causes much reinventing of the wheel.
Accepting patches :-)
removing blocker of bug 208444 (rpm summary missing info)
This report targets the FC3 or FC4 products, which have now been EOL'd. Could you please check that it still applies to a current Fedora release, and either update the target product or close it ? Thanks.
Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported against rawhide during the development of a Fedora release that is no longer maintained. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained. If this bug remains in NEEDINFO thirty (30) days from now, we will automatically close it. If you can reproduce this bug in a maintained Fedora version (7, 8, or rawhide), please change this bug to the respective version and change the status to ASSIGNED. (If you're unable to change the bug's version or status, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.) Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again.
Yes this one still applies as rhpl still doesn't really have much in the way of documentation. We'll gladly accept patches to correct this, but right now it's highly unlikely we have time to work on it. In the meantime, we'll continue trying to remove rhpl piece by piece.