Spec URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews//ghc-microlens-platform.spec SRPM URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews//ghc-microlens-platform-0.3.11-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: This package exports a module which is the recommended starting point for using <http://hackage.haskell.org/package/microlens microlens> if you aren't trying to keep your dependencies minimal. By importing 'Lens.Micro.Platform' you get all functions and instances from <http://hackage.haskell.org/package/microlens microlens>, <http://hackage.haskell.org/package/microlens-th microlens-th>, <http://hackage.haskell.org/package/microlens-mtl microlens-mtl>, <http://hackage.haskell.org/package/microlens-ghc microlens-ghc>, as well as instances for 'Vector', 'Text', and 'HashMap'. The minor and major versions of microlens-platform are incremented whenever the minor and major versions of any other microlens package are incremented, so you can depend on the exact version of microlens-platform without specifying the version of microlens (microlens-mtl, etc) you need. This package is a part of the <http://hackage.haskell.org/package/microlens microlens> family; see the readme <https://github.com/monadfix/microlens#readme on Github>.
This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39959890
- Latest version is 0.4.0 Package approved. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. Note: No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/ ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License", "BSD (unspecified)". 3 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/ghc-microlens- platform/review-ghc-microlens-platform/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [!]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: ghc-microlens-platform-0.3.11-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm ghc-microlens-platform-devel-0.3.11-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm ghc-microlens-platform-0.3.11-1.fc32.src.rpm ghc-microlens-platform.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hackage -> package, hack age, hack-age ghc-microlens-platform.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US haskell -> Haskell, seashell ghc-microlens-platform.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US th -> ht, Th, t ghc-microlens-platform.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mtl -> mt, ml, mil ghc-microlens-platform.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US readme -> reamed, remade, read me ghc-microlens-platform.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US https -> HTTP ghc-microlens-platform.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US github -> git hub, git-hub, GitHub ghc-microlens-platform.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US monadfix -> aficionado ghc-microlens-platform.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-microlens-platform.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hackage -> package, hack age, hack-age ghc-microlens-platform.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US haskell -> Haskell, seashell ghc-microlens-platform.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US th -> ht, Th, t ghc-microlens-platform.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mtl -> mt, ml, mil ghc-microlens-platform.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US readme -> reamed, remade, read me ghc-microlens-platform.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US https -> HTTP ghc-microlens-platform.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US github -> git hub, git-hub, GitHub ghc-microlens-platform.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US monadfix -> aficionado 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 17 warnings.
Thank you for the review
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/21513
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-microlens-platform
FEDORA-2020-462998096f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-462998096f
ghc-microlens-platform-0.3.11-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-462998096f
ghc-microlens-platform-0.3.11-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.