Description of problem: Some third-party packages (saltstack) require python-pyzmq package. RedHat python-zmq package declares to provide python-pyzmq, but epel python2-zmq, which is obsoleting it doesn't do. Could you just add a provide at the filelist? How reproducible: just use "repoquery --provides python-zmq" (RH) vs "repoquery --provides python2-zmq" Steps to Reproduce: 1. repoquery --provides python-zmq python-pyzmq = 14.5.0-2.1 python-zmq = 14.5.0-2.1 python-zmq(x86-64) = 14.5.0-2.1 2. repoquery --provides python2-zmq python-zmq = 14.7.0-8.el7 python-zmq(x86-64) = 14.7.0-8.el7 python2-zmq = 14.7.0-8.el7 python2-zmq(x86-64) = 14.7.0-8.el7 Additional info: <log> Error: Package: python2-salt-2019.2.0-115.1.x86_64 (@susemanager:nightly-res7-suse-manager-tools-x86_64) Requires: python-pyzmq >= 2.2.0 Removing: python-zmq-14.5.0-2.1.x86_64 (@susemanager:nightly-res7-suse-manager-tools-x86_64) python-pyzmq = 14.5.0-2.1 Obsoleted By: python2-zmq-14.7.0-8.el7.x86_64 (susemanager:nightly-rhel7-epel-x86-64) Not found
I've just opened a PR for this. But I'm not even sure if this is the right place: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-zmq/pull-request/5 Please let me know if anything else is needed or needs to be changed! Thanks!
Yeah, thats the right place, but for epel7 (which this bug is against, it would need to be in the epel7 branch). I can merge and build that one for rawhide, but can you do another PR for epel7 branch to solve this one? (or I can, but I am about to head out on a trip, so it might be a bit
Thanks Kevin! I've just opened an other PR against epel7. Hopefully the version numbers in the changelog are correct. Let me know if you increment in a different way. But speaking of different versions. Wouldn't it make sense to also have this change for RHEL?
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-de416d5750 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-de416d5750
(In reply to Jochen Breuer from comment #3) > Thanks Kevin! I've just opened an other PR against epel7. Hopefully the > version numbers in the changelog are correct. Let me know if you increment > in a different way. > > But speaking of different versions. Wouldn't it make sense to also have this > change for RHEL? That would be up to them. I have nothing to do with that package. ;) You can file a bug on it and see...
python-zmq-14.7.0-10.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-de416d5750
Hello I still cannot see python-pyzmq to be provided by python2-zmq: repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=epel-testing --provides python2-zmq python-zmq = 14.7.0-10.el7 python-zmq(x86-64) = 14.7.0-10.el7 python2-zmq = 14.7.0-10.el7 python2-zmq(x86-64) = 14.7.0-10.el7 I was expecting to find python-pyzmq as it is on the RH one: repoquery --provides python-zmq python-pyzmq = 14.5.0-2.1 python-zmq = 14.5.0-2.1 python-zmq(x86-64) = 14.5.0-2.1 Regards
Man, I was really not paying enough attention here. Sorry about that. Fixed build coming...
Hi Kevin No matter; now it's ok. Thanks
python-zmq-14.7.0-11.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.