Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-fern.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-fern-0.5.9-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Simple, efficient logging. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo
Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=40447397
Some of the subpackages cannot be installed: Error: Problem 1: conflicting requests - nothing provides (crate(reopen/default) >= 0.3.0 with crate(reopen/default) < 0.4.0) needed by rust-fern+reopen-03-devel-0.5.9-1.fc32.noarch Problem 2: conflicting requests - nothing provides (crate(reopen/default) >= 0.3.0 with crate(reopen/default) < 0.4.0) needed by rust-fern+reopen-devel-0.5.9-1.fc32.noarch Problem 3: conflicting requests - nothing provides (crate(syslog/default) >= 3.0.0 with crate(syslog/default) < 4.0.0) needed by rust-fern+syslog3-devel-0.5.9-1.fc32.noarch Problem 4: conflicting requests - nothing provides (crate(syslog/default) >= 4.0.0 with crate(syslog/default) < 5.0.0) needed by rust-fern+syslog4-devel-0.5.9-1.fc32.noarch Problem 5: package rust-fern+syslog-4-devel-0.5.9-1.fc32.noarch requires crate(fern/syslog4) = 0.5.9, but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests - nothing provides (crate(syslog/default) >= 4.0.0 with crate(syslog/default) < 5.0.0) needed by rust-fern+syslog4-devel-0.5.9-1.fc32.noarch Problem 6: package rust-fern+syslog-3-devel-0.5.9-1.fc32.noarch requires crate(fern/syslog3) = 0.5.9, but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests - nothing provides (crate(syslog/default) >= 3.0.0 with crate(syslog/default) < 4.0.0) needed by rust-fern+syslog3-devel-0.5.9-1.fc32.noarch (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)
These are packages created for optional dependencies, we only need to package them when such an optional dependencies are requested by another package. Thatqs how Rust packaging work at least.
From https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_package_dependencies: "All package dependencies (build-time or runtime, regular, weak or otherwise) MUST ALWAYS be satisfiable within the official Fedora repositories." These dependencies are not satisfiable within the official Fedora repositories. You will have to remove or comment out those subpackages until such time as the dependencies are available in Fedora.
New Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-fern.spec New SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-fern-0.5.9-1.fc32.src.rpm
Hmmm, something has gone awry. The build failed. There were lots of warnings like this: warning: Macro expanded in comment on line 91: %{name}+reopen-devel warning: Macro expanded in comment on line 92: %{summary} warning: Macro expanded in comment on line 95: %{name}+reopen-devel %{_description} warning: Macro expanded in comment on line 98: %{crate}" crate. warning: Macro expanded in comment on line 100: %{name}+reopen-devel ... then the actual failure: File must begin with "/": Simple, File must begin with "/": efficient File must begin with "/": logging. File must begin with "/": Simple, File must begin with "/": efficient File must begin with "/": logging. File must begin with "/": Simple, File must begin with "/": efficient File must begin with "/": logging. File must begin with "/": Simple, File must begin with "/": efficient File must begin with "/": logging. File must begin with "/": Simple, File must begin with "/": efficient File must begin with "/": logging. File must begin with "/": Simple, File must begin with "/": efficient File must begin with "/": logging. I think you will have to double up at least some of the commented % signs. This is my theory. The %files section that begins on line 88 is seeing the expanded %{summary} lines in the commented-out subpackages.
Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=40499636
Looks good. This package is APPROVED. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 3 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: rust-fern-devel-0.5.9-1.fc32.noarch.rpm rust-fern+default-devel-0.5.9-1.fc32.noarch.rpm rust-fern+colored-devel-0.5.9-1.fc32.noarch.rpm rust-fern+libc-devel-0.5.9-1.fc32.noarch.rpm rust-fern+meta-logging-in-format-devel-0.5.9-1.fc32.noarch.rpm rust-fern-0.5.9-1.fc32.src.rpm rust-fern-devel.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://crates.io/crates/fern HTTP Error 404: Not Found rust-fern-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/cargo/registry/fern-0.5.9/.cargo-checksum.json rust-fern+default-devel.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://crates.io/crates/fern HTTP Error 404: Not Found rust-fern+default-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation rust-fern+colored-devel.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://crates.io/crates/fern HTTP Error 404: Not Found rust-fern+colored-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation rust-fern+libc-devel.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://crates.io/crates/fern HTTP Error 404: Not Found rust-fern+libc-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation rust-fern+meta-logging-in-format-devel.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://crates.io/crates/fern HTTP Error 404: Not Found rust-fern+meta-logging-in-format-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation rust-fern.src: W: invalid-url URL: https://crates.io/crates/fern HTTP Error 404: Not Found 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- rust-fern+colored-devel.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://crates.io/crates/fern HTTP Error 404: Not Found rust-fern+colored-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation rust-fern+default-devel.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://crates.io/crates/fern HTTP Error 404: Not Found rust-fern+default-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation rust-fern-devel.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://crates.io/crates/fern HTTP Error 404: Not Found rust-fern-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/cargo/registry/fern-0.5.9/.cargo-checksum.json rust-fern+libc-devel.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://crates.io/crates/fern HTTP Error 404: Not Found rust-fern+libc-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation rust-fern+meta-logging-in-format-devel.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://crates.io/crates/fern HTTP Error 404: Not Found rust-fern+meta-logging-in-format-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings. Source checksums ---------------- https://crates.io/api/v1/crates/fern/0.5.9/download#/fern-0.5.9.crate : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : e69ab0d5aca163e388c3a49d284fed6c3d0810700e77c5ae2756a50ec1a4daaa CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : e69ab0d5aca163e388c3a49d284fed6c3d0810700e77c5ae2756a50ec1a4daaa Requires -------- rust-fern-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): (crate(chrono/default) >= 0.4.0 with crate(chrono/default) < 0.5.0) (crate(log/default) >= 0.4.0 with crate(log/default) < 0.5.0) (crate(log/std) >= 0.4.0 with crate(log/std) < 0.5.0) cargo rust-fern+default-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): cargo crate(fern) rust-fern+colored-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): (crate(colored/default) >= 1.5.0 with crate(colored/default) < 2.0.0) cargo crate(fern) rust-fern+libc-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): (crate(libc/default) >= 0.2.58 with crate(libc/default) < 0.3.0) cargo crate(fern) rust-fern+meta-logging-in-format-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): cargo crate(fern) Provides -------- rust-fern-devel: crate(fern) rust-fern-devel rust-fern+default-devel: crate(fern/default) rust-fern+default-devel rust-fern+colored-devel: crate(fern/colored) rust-fern+colored-devel rust-fern+libc-devel: crate(fern/libc) rust-fern+libc-devel rust-fern+meta-logging-in-format-devel: crate(fern/meta-logging-in-format) rust-fern+meta-logging-in-format-devel Generated by fedora-review 0.7.4 (54fa030) last change: 2019-12-07 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1790217 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, fonts, Python, SugarActivity, C/C++, Ocaml, R, PHP, Perl, Haskell, Ruby Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-fern