Bug 179263 – Review Request: perl-Text-Unidecode - US-ASCII transliterations of Unicode text

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.

Bug 179263 - Review Request: perl-Text-Unidecode - US-ASCII transliterations of Unicode text

Summary:	Review Request: perl-Text-Unidecode - US-ASCII transliterations of Unicode text

Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	Package Review (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Jason Tibbitts
QA Contact:	David Lawrence
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:	FE-ACCEPT
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2006-01-29 06:13 EST by Patrice Dumas
Modified:	2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-02-05 07:02:26 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Patrice Dumas 2006-01-29 06:13:27 EST

SRPM Name or Url: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-Text-Unidecode-0.04-1.src.rpm
Description:

Text::Unidecode provides a function, `unidecode(...)' that
takes Unicode data and tries to represent it in US-ASCII
characters (i.e., the universally displayable characters between
0x00 and 0x7F). The representation is almost always an attempt at
*transliteration* -- i.e., conveying, in Roman letters, the
pronunciation expressed by the text in some other writing
system.

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2006-01-30 19:03:22 EST

Good:
Package builds and rpmlint finds nothing at all to complain about.
Package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
License is acceptable, matches License: tag and included in %doc (as part of
README).
Specfile is legible, well-written and uses macros consistently.

Bad:
Nothing.  "BuildRequires: perl" is not necessary (see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions ) but
 this is not a blocker.

Approved.

Comment 2 Patrice Dumas 2006-02-05 07:02:26 EST

I have filled a bug about the BuildRequires: perl, and then send a mail on the
fedora mailing list.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.