Bug 1792741 - Review Request: openssl11 - Utilities from the general purpose cryptography library with TLS implementation
Summary: Review Request: openssl11 - Utilities from the general purpose cryptography l...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: epel7
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Christian Dersch
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1806049
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-01-19 14:50 UTC by Robert Scheck
Modified: 2020-03-21 02:12 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-03-21 02:12:57 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:
lupinix.fedora: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Diff between current OpenSSL from RHEL 8 and this package (7.75 KB, patch)
2020-01-19 14:53 UTC, Robert Scheck
no flags Details | Diff

Description Robert Scheck 2020-01-19 14:50:06 UTC
Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/openssl11.spec
SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/openssl11-1.1.1c-1.el7.src.rpm
Description: The OpenSSL toolkit provides support for secure communications between machines. OpenSSL includes a certificate management tool and shared libraries which provide various cryptographic algorithms and protocols.
Fedora Account System Username: robert


This package is intended only for EPEL 7 to provide some kind of forward compatibility for specific applications. RHEL 7 is only shipping the old openssl-1.0.2k-19.el7 (and it won't change that as stated in bug #1416715). So this is openssl-1.1.1c-2.el8 from RHEL 8 modified to be installable along with the regular package. The package itself was as less modified as possible to make the differences hopefully easily reviewable.

Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2020-01-19 14:53:32 UTC
Created attachment 1653653 [details]
Diff between current OpenSSL from RHEL 8 and this package

Comment 2 Christian Dersch 2020-03-05 15:01:52 UTC
Approved! The package differs from the EL 8 package only where required and keeps close to the upstream package otherwise.



Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed




===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
     Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
     attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
     BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "OpenSSL License", "OpenSSL License BSD
     2-clause "Simplified" License", "Apache License (v2.0)", "OpenSSL
     License Public domain BSD (unspecified)", "OpenSSL License Apache
     License (v2.0)", "OpenSSL License BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised"
     License", "OpenSSL License BSD (unspecified)", "OpenSSL License
     Mozilla Public License (v1.1)", "Artistic License". 1421 files have
     unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/lupinix/1792741-openssl11/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/lib64/openssl11
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/openssl11
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /etc/pki/tls(ca-certificates,
     openssl-libs), /etc/pki/tls/certs(ca-certificates, openssl-libs),
     /etc/pki/tls/misc(openssl-libs), /etc/pki/tls/private(openssl-libs)
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 655360 bytes in 8 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: Static libraries in -static or -devel subpackage, providing -devel if
     present.
     Note: Package has .a files: openssl11-static.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
     openssl11-libs , openssl11-devel , openssl11-static
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
     justified.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
     Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[-]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
     Note: %define requiring justification: %define soversion 1.1, %define
     multilib_arches %{ix86} ia64 %{mips} ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sparcv9
     sparc64 x86_64, %define __spec_install_post
     %{?__debug_package:%{__debug_install_post}} %{__arch_install_post}
     %{__os_install_post} crypto/fips/fips_standalone_hmac
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/libcrypto.so.%{version}
     >$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/.libcrypto.so.%{version}.hmac ln -sf
     .libcrypto.so.%{version}.hmac
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/.libcrypto.so.%{soversion}.hmac
     crypto/fips/fips_standalone_hmac
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/libssl.so.%{version}
     >$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/.libssl.so.%{version}.hmac ln -sf
     .libssl.so.%{version}.hmac
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/.libssl.so.%{soversion}.hmac %{nil}, %define
     __provides_exclude_from %{_libdir}/openssl
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[-]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
     Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 4853760 bytes in /usr/share
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: openssl11-1.1.1c-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
          openssl11-libs-1.1.1c-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
          openssl11-devel-1.1.1c-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
          openssl11-static-1.1.1c-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
          openssl11-debuginfo-1.1.1c-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
          openssl11-1.1.1c-1.el7.src.rpm
openssl11.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1.1c-1 ['1:1.1.1c-1.el7', '1:1.1.1c-1']
openssl11.x86_64: W: crypto-policy-non-compliance-openssl /usr/bin/openssl11 SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list
openssl11.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary make-dummy-cert
openssl11.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary renew-dummy-cert
openssl11-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation
openssl11-libs.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib64/.libcrypto.so.1.1.1c.hmac
openssl11-libs.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib64/.libcrypto.so.1.1.hmac
openssl11-libs.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib64/.libssl.so.1.1.1c.hmac
openssl11-libs.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib64/.libssl.so.1.1.hmac
openssl11-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation
openssl11.src: W: strange-permission hobble-openssl 755
openssl11.src: W: strange-permission make-dummy-cert 755
openssl11.src: W: strange-permission renew-dummy-cert 755
openssl11.src:181: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 181)
openssl11.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch41: openssl-1.1.1-system-cipherlist.patch
openssl11.src: W: invalid-url Source0: openssl-1.1.1c-hobbled.tar.xz
6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 16 warnings.




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: openssl11-debuginfo-1.1.1c-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
openssl11-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.openssl.org/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
openssl11-debuginfo.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
openssl11-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.openssl.org/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
openssl11-static.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.openssl.org/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
openssl11-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation
openssl11.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1.1c-1 ['1:1.1.1c-1.el7', '1:1.1.1c-1']
openssl11.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.openssl.org/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
openssl11.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary make-dummy-cert
openssl11.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary renew-dummy-cert
openssl11-libs.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.openssl.org/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
openssl11-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation
openssl11-libs.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib64/.libcrypto.so.1.1.hmac
openssl11-libs.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib64/.libssl.so.1.1.1c.hmac
openssl11-libs.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib64/.libssl.so.1.1.hmac
openssl11-libs.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib64/.libcrypto.so.1.1.1c.hmac
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 15 warnings.



Unversioned so-files
--------------------
openssl11-libs: /usr/lib64/engines-1.1/afalg.so
openssl11-libs: /usr/lib64/engines-1.1/capi.so
openssl11-libs: /usr/lib64/engines-1.1/padlock.so

Requires
--------
openssl11 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /bin/bash
    /bin/sh
    coreutils
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libcrypto.so.1.1()(64bit)
    libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0)(64bit)
    libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_1)(64bit)
    libdl.so.2()(64bit)
    libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
    libssl.so.1.1()(64bit)
    libssl.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0)(64bit)
    libssl.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_1)(64bit)
    libz.so.1()(64bit)
    openssl11-libs(x86-64)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

openssl11-libs (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /sbin/ldconfig
    ca-certificates
    config(openssl11-libs)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libcrypto.so.1.1()(64bit)
    libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0)(64bit)
    libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0d)(64bit)
    libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0f)(64bit)
    libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0i)(64bit)
    libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_1)(64bit)
    libdl.so.2()(64bit)
    libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
    libz.so.1()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

openssl11-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/pkg-config
    krb5-devel(x86-64)
    libcrypto.so.1.1()(64bit)
    libssl.so.1.1()(64bit)
    openssl11-libs(x86-64)
    pkgconfig
    pkgconfig(libcrypto11)
    pkgconfig(libssl11)
    zlib-devel(x86-64)

openssl11-static (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    openssl11-devel(x86-64)

openssl11-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Provides
--------
openssl11:
    openssl11
    openssl11(x86-64)

openssl11-libs:
    config(openssl11-libs)
    libcrypto.so.1.1()(64bit)
    libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0)(64bit)
    libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0a)(64bit)
    libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0c)(64bit)
    libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0d)(64bit)
    libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0f)(64bit)
    libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0g)(64bit)
    libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0h)(64bit)
    libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0i)(64bit)
    libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0j)(64bit)
    libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_1)(64bit)
    libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_1b)(64bit)
    libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_1c)(64bit)
    libssl.so.1.1()(64bit)
    libssl.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0)(64bit)
    libssl.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0d)(64bit)
    libssl.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_1)(64bit)
    libssl.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_1a)(64bit)
    openssl11-libs
    openssl11-libs(x86-64)

openssl11-devel:
    openssl11-devel
    openssl11-devel(x86-64)
    pkgconfig(libcrypto11)
    pkgconfig(libssl11)
    pkgconfig(openssl11)

openssl11-static:
    openssl11-static
    openssl11-static(x86-64)

openssl11-debuginfo:
    openssl11-debuginfo
    openssl11-debuginfo(x86-64)



Generated by fedora-review 0.7.5 (5fa5b7e) last change: 2020-02-16
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -v -m epel-7-x86_64 -b 1792741 -o --yum
Buildroot used: epel-7-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, C/C++, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: PHP, R, Perl, Java, SugarActivity, Haskell, Python, Ocaml, fonts
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH

Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2020-03-05 16:13:09 UTC
Thank you very much for the review!

Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2020-03-05 17:00:35 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openssl11

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2020-03-06 03:46:56 UTC
openssl11-1.1.1c-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-dbd93b41e9

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2020-03-21 02:12:57 UTC
openssl11-1.1.1c-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.