python-geopy fails to build with Python 3.9.0a2. ________________ TestDefaultDistanceClass.test_lonlat_function _________________ test/test_distance.py:294: in test_lonlat_function self.assertEqual(point, (41.49008, -71.312796, 0)) geopy/point.py:264: in __eq__ if not isinstance(other, collections.Iterable): E AttributeError: module 'collections' has no attribute 'Iterable' ______________________ LocationTestCase.test_location_eq _______________________ test/test_location.py:145: in test_location_eq self.assertEqual(loc1, loc2) geopy/location.py:136: in __eq__ self._point == other._point and geopy/point.py:264: in __eq__ if not isinstance(other, collections.Iterable): E AttributeError: module 'collections' has no attribute 'Iterable' _____________________ LocationTestCase.test_location_init ______________________ test/test_location.py:67: in test_location_init self.assertEqual(loc.point, GRAND_CENTRAL_POINT) geopy/location.py:87: in point return self._point if self._point != (None, None, None) else None geopy/point.py:269: in __ne__ return not (self == other) geopy/point.py:264: in __eq__ if not isinstance(other, collections.Iterable): E AttributeError: module 'collections' has no attribute 'Iterable' _________________ LocationTestCase.test_location_is_picklable __________________ test/test_location.py:183: in test_location_is_picklable self.assertEqual(loc, loc_unp) geopy/location.py:136: in __eq__ self._point == other._point and geopy/point.py:264: in __eq__ if not isinstance(other, collections.Iterable): E AttributeError: module 'collections' has no attribute 'Iterable' _____________________ LocationTestCase.test_location_iter ______________________ test/test_location.py:91: in test_location_iter self.assertEqual(loc.point, GRAND_CENTRAL_POINT) geopy/location.py:87: in point return self._point if self._point != (None, None, None) else None geopy/point.py:269: in __ne__ return not (self == other) geopy/point.py:264: in __eq__ if not isinstance(other, collections.Iterable): E AttributeError: module 'collections' has no attribute 'Iterable' ______________________ LocationTestCase.test_location_ne _______________________ test/test_location.py:153: in test_location_ne self.assertNotEqual(loc1, loc2) geopy/location.py:141: in __ne__ return not (self == other) geopy/location.py:136: in __eq__ self._point == other._point and geopy/point.py:264: in __eq__ if not isinstance(other, collections.Iterable): E AttributeError: module 'collections' has no attribute 'Iterable' _____________________ LocationTestCase.test_location_point _____________________ test/test_location.py:75: in test_location_point self.assertEqual(loc.point, GRAND_CENTRAL_POINT) geopy/location.py:87: in point return self._point if self._point != (None, None, None) else None geopy/point.py:269: in __ne__ return not (self == other) geopy/point.py:264: in __eq__ if not isinstance(other, collections.Iterable): E AttributeError: module 'collections' has no attribute 'Iterable' ________ PointTestCase.test_point_comparison_does_not_raise_exceptions _________ test/test_point.py:319: in test_point_comparison_does_not_raise_exceptions self.assertFalse(point == number) geopy/point.py:264: in __eq__ if not isinstance(other, collections.Iterable): E AttributeError: module 'collections' has no attribute 'Iterable' _____________ PointTestCase.test_point_comparison_ignores_strings ______________ test/test_point.py:358: in test_point_comparison_ignores_strings self.assertFalse(point == "123") geopy/point.py:264: in __eq__ if not isinstance(other, collections.Iterable): E AttributeError: module 'collections' has no attribute 'Iterable' ______________ PointTestCase.test_point_comparison_respects_lists ______________ test/test_point.py:346: in test_point_comparison_respects_lists self.assertTrue(l_eq == point) geopy/point.py:264: in __eq__ if not isinstance(other, collections.Iterable): E AttributeError: module 'collections' has no attribute 'Iterable' ____________ PointTestCase.test_point_comparison_with_empty_values _____________ test/test_point.py:328: in test_point_comparison_with_empty_values self.assertFalse(point_nonempty in empty_values) geopy/point.py:264: in __eq__ if not isinstance(other, collections.Iterable): E AttributeError: module 'collections' has no attribute 'Iterable' _________________________ PointTestCase.test_point_eq __________________________ test/test_point.py:301: in test_point_eq self.assertEqual( geopy/point.py:264: in __eq__ if not isinstance(other, collections.Iterable): E AttributeError: module 'collections' has no attribute 'Iterable' ____________________ PointTestCase.test_point_from_iterable ____________________ test/test_point.py:109: in test_point_from_iterable self.assertEqual(Point(1, 2, 3), Point([1, 2, 3])) geopy/point.py:264: in __eq__ if not isinstance(other, collections.Iterable): E AttributeError: module 'collections' has no attribute 'Iterable' _____________________ PointTestCase.test_point_from_string _____________________ test/test_point.py:81: in test_point_from_string self.assertEqual(Point("41.5;-81.0"), (41.5, -81.0, 0.0)) geopy/point.py:264: in __eq__ if not isinstance(other, collections.Iterable): E AttributeError: module 'collections' has no attribute 'Iterable' ____________________ PointTestCase.test_point_is_picklable _____________________ test/test_point.py:368: in test_point_is_picklable self.assertEqual(point, point_unp) geopy/point.py:264: in __eq__ if not isinstance(other, collections.Iterable): E AttributeError: module 'collections' has no attribute 'Iterable' _________________________ PointTestCase.test_point_ne __________________________ test/test_point.py:311: in test_point_ne Point(self.lat, self.lon, self.alt) != geopy/point.py:269: in __ne__ return not (self == other) geopy/point.py:264: in __eq__ if not isinstance(other, collections.Iterable): E AttributeError: module 'collections' has no attribute 'Iterable' See https://docs.python.org/3.9/whatsnew/3.9.html#removed "The abstract base classes in collections.abc no longer are exposed in the regular collections module. This will help create a clearer distinction between the concrete classes and the abstract base classes." For the build logs, see: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.9/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01161364-python-geopy/ For all our attempts to build python-geopy with Python 3.9, see: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.9/package/python-geopy/ Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr. You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.9: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.9/ Let us know here if you have any questions. Python 3.9 will be included in Fedora 33. To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with early pre-releases of Python 3.9. A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires), so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon. We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side.
Upstream issue : https://github.com/geopy/geopy/issues/377 . As per discussion seems to be fixed with https://github.com/geopy/geopy/pull/335
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle. Changing version to 32.
PR#390 seems a better bet since it's for the v1 branch.
In Python 3.9.0a4 we have managed to revert the change that disables importing abstract base classes (collections.abc) directly form the regular collections module. It was reverted to ease transition for projects that did not yet actually dropped support for Python 2.7. The removal is scheduled for Python 3.10 instead. We are mass closing all the bug reports about build failures that were caused by this. Expect a new Bugzilla report in case this package fails to build with Python 3.9 for a different reason as well. In case you haven't done this already, we highly recommend to talk to your upstream and get this fixed anyway, because this will return in Python 3.10 and Python upstream is very unlikely to postpone this once more. In case you've already done that, thank you (this message is mass posted to all the relevant Bugzillas).