Bug 179567
| Summary: | Cannot delete normal users from the Satellite | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite 5 | Reporter: | Kent Baxley <kbaxley> | ||||||
| Component: | Server | Assignee: | James Slagle <jslagle> | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Vlady Zlatkin <vzlatkin> | ||||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||||
| Version: | 400 | CC: | cperry, jslagle, rhn-bugs | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | i386 | ||||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | rhn406 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2006-04-11 14:38:44 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 171832 | ||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
Kent Baxley
2006-02-01 14:20:31 UTC
Created attachment 123964 [details]
output from catalina.out
Output from /var/log/tomcat5/catalina.out attached. Traceback output will be
posted later.
Created attachment 124015 [details]
Traceback email from failure
Traceback email attached
that exception would be caused by: 1. you're not on a satellite (not the case here) 2. there are no other org admins available (doesn't seem to be the case) 3. there is a row somewhere that's not getting cleaned up before deleting from web-contact Can we verify that the java code is doing what the perl code used to be doing in the case? I ask, b/c somethin similiar came up before, and the cause was that the logic in the java code had changed from the perl days: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156752 I can't reprodue this bug following the steps from Kent. Kent, can you provide any additional info? There haven't been any changes to the stored procedure. Ryan, have you verified that the Java code is doing the exact same thing the perl code was? sent Kent email directly asking if he has any more info. closing. couldn't reproduce on 4.0.6 |