Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1796161

Summary:	need to create the IBM Cloud Platform type for the ingress operator
Product:	OpenShift Container Platform	Reporter:	ayma <ayma>
Component:	openshift-apiserver	Assignee:	ayma <ayma>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Mike Fiedler <mifiedle>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	4.4	CC:	aos-bugs, ayma, cewong, mfojtik, mifiedle, xtian
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	4.4.0
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	IBMROKS
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-05-04 11:27:55 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1796108

Description ayma@us.ibm.com 2020-01-29 18:09:09 UTC

Description of problem:
Current the ingress operator deploys the LB and router.  However need some annotations that are specific to the IBM platform for the LB deployment. Need to edit the API to allow for this new Cloud platfomr

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.4 and 4.3

Comment 1 ayma@us.ibm.com 2020-01-29 18:18:09 UTC

this is in relation to  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796108

Comment 3 Mike Fiedler 2020-01-31 20:04:34 UTC

@ayma - is this issue resolved in recent 4.4 builds?   OpenShift QE has no way to functionally verify this.

Comment 4 Cesar Wong 2020-01-31 20:41:36 UTC

Mike, I can verify that it does what it needs to do to enable IBM cloud. Going forward, the approach we'll take for these PRs is that somebody involved with the IBM cloud project verifies that it does what it's supposed to do, and on the Red Hat side we verify that it did not regress anything.

This particular PR is only adding a new constant and status struct for an IBM cloud provider to the API, no function was added or changed.

Comment 5 Mike Fiedler 2020-02-03 15:01:52 UTC

Thanks, @cewong.  Marking verified based on comment 4.  If there is still an issue, please move state to ASSIGNED.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2020-05-04 11:27:55 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:0581