Bug 1797064
| Summary: | virtiofsd: Fixes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux Advanced Virtualization | Reporter: | Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert> | ||||
| Component: | qemu-kvm | Assignee: | Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert> | ||||
| qemu-kvm sub component: | General | QA Contact: | Yongxue Hong <yhong> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | unspecified | ||||||
| Priority: | medium | CC: | coli, jinzhao, juzhang, mmizuma, virt-maint, xuhan, yoguma | ||||
| Version: | 8.2 | Keywords: | Triaged | ||||
| Target Milestone: | rc | Flags: | pm-rhel:
mirror+
|
||||
| Target Release: | 8.0 | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | qemu-kvm-4.2.0-14.module+el8.2.0+5995+d02a4eeb | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2020-05-05 09:57:11 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1808604 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-01-31 20:08:58 UTC
QEMU has been recently split into sub-components and as a one-time operation to avoid breakage of tools, we are setting the QEMU sub-component of this BZ to "General". Please review and change the sub-component if necessary the next time you review this BZ. Thanks I think we need in this: 09c086b2a144324199f9 - Fix fuse_out_header::error value 99ce9a7e60fd12b213b985343ff8fcc172de59fd - virtiofsd: do_read missing NULL check Probably also want Misono's 'Fix xattr operation' set that's currently on list. Created attachment 1670037 [details]
xfstests_generic_062.diff
Hi, Dr. David For Comment 9, the steps of verification are right? Thanks. (In reply to Yongxue Hong from comment #11) > Hi, Dr. David > > For Comment 9, the steps of verification are right? > > Thanks. Thanks; Given Masayoshi's answer on bz 1808604 then that looks fine. (In reply to Dr. David Alan Gilbert from comment #12) > (In reply to Yongxue Hong from comment #11) > > Hi, Dr. David > > > > For Comment 9, the steps of verification are right? > > > > Thanks. > > Thanks; Given Masayoshi's answer on bz 1808604 then that looks fine. Thanks, from the comment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808604#c7, change the status to VERIFIED. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:2017 |