Bug 1797528
| Summary: | ManagedBlockStorage disk is not deleted when VM is removed | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [oVirt] ovirt-engine | Reporter: | Andrew Sharapov <asharapov> | ||||
| Component: | BLL.Storage | Assignee: | shani <sleviim> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | sshmulev | ||||
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 4.3.7.2 | CC: | bugs, eshenitz, michal.skrivanek, sfishbai, shalygin.k | ||||
| Target Milestone: | ovirt-4.4.9 | Flags: | pm-rhel:
ovirt-4.4+
|
||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2021-08-25 10:42:49 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | Storage | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Andrew Sharapov
2020-02-03 11:19:31 UTC
The documentation text flag should only be set after 'doc text' field is provided. Please provide the documentation text and set the flag to '?' again. Hi Andrew, We had some changes and fixed several bugs related to the MBS feature. Currently, I'm using the ovirt-engine-4.4.8.5_master version, and VMs containing MBS disks can be deleted from the UI for me. Can you please share your current ovirt-engine and let us know if the issue still exists? Also, can you please share your cinderlib log? (var/log/ovirt-engine/cinderlib/cinderlib.log) Hello, In my tests the VM was deleted as well, but the disk of the vm, which was located in MBS (ceph rbd backend) was not deleted. Unfortunately the system I used to test MBS is no longer available, so I cannot re-run tests and provide any new logs. Thank you for the reply, Andrew. IIUC, there are no logs from your current ovirt environment at all, right? Are the tests you've mentioned based on the tries you did when you opened the bug? I'm afraid that without any logs for examining the failure, there's no clear way how to progress from here. As the code was changed, so the problematic scenario might act differently. What do you think? (In reply to shani from comment #5) > Thank you for the reply, Andrew. > IIUC, there are no logs from your current ovirt environment at all, right? > Are the tests you've mentioned based on the tries you did when you opened > the bug? > > I'm afraid that without any logs for examining the failure, there's no clear > way how to progress from here. > As the code was changed, so the problematic scenario might act differently. > > What do you think? Let's test the basic flows of removing VMs with MBS disks attached - 1. VM with MBS disks only 2. Remove the VM and mark 'Remove Disk(s)' checkbox ==> VM and disks should be removed 1. VM with MBS disks and 'regular' disks 2. Remove the VM and mark 'Remove Disk(s)' checkbox ==> VM and disks should be removed If all works well we can close this bug as 'WORKSFORME' VM with MBS disks only - VM & disks removal succeeded. VM with image + MBS disk - VM & disks removal succeeded. Therefore, closing the bug as WORKSFORME. Andrew, if there's another issue/same issue reproduced, please let us know. |