Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1798401

Summary:	Valgrind reports errors and lost memory when running rpm -Uvh with rpm-plugin-systemd-inhibit
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8	Reporter:	Eva Mrakova <emrakova>
Component:	rpm	Assignee:	Packaging Maintenance Team <packaging-team-maint>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	swm-qe
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	8.2	CC:	awilliam, emrakova, ffesti, jpazdziora, pmatilai
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Regression
Target Release:	8.3
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	1714657	Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-02-11 08:49:45 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Comment 12 Panu Matilainen 2020-02-11 08:49:45 UTC

The DBUS maintainers kindly pointed out in bug 1798899 that this case is covered in the DBUS API documentation https://dbus.freedesktop.org/doc/api/html/group__DBusMemory.html#ga01912903e39428872920d861ef565bac:

> There is absolutely no requirement to call dbus_shutdown() - in fact, most applications won't bother and should not feel 
> guilty.
>
> You have to know that nobody is using libdbus in your application's process before you can call dbus_shutdown(). One 
> implication of this is that calling dbus_shutdown() from a library is almost certainly wrong, since you don't know what
> the rest of the app is up to. 

Calling from a library is exactly what is going on here, so we will not be able to fix this.