RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1798401 - Valgrind reports errors and lost memory when running rpm -Uvh with rpm-plugin-systemd-inhibit
Summary: Valgrind reports errors and lost memory when running rpm -Uvh with rpm-plugin...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: rpm
Version: 8.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: 8.3
Assignee: Packaging Maintenance Team
QA Contact: swm-qe
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-02-05 09:19 UTC by Eva Mrakova
Modified: 2020-02-11 08:49 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1714657
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-02-11 08:49:45 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 12 Panu Matilainen 2020-02-11 08:49:45 UTC
The DBUS maintainers kindly pointed out in bug 1798899 that this case is covered in the DBUS API documentation https://dbus.freedesktop.org/doc/api/html/group__DBusMemory.html#ga01912903e39428872920d861ef565bac:

> There is absolutely no requirement to call dbus_shutdown() - in fact, most applications won't bother and should not feel 
> guilty.
>
> You have to know that nobody is using libdbus in your application's process before you can call dbus_shutdown(). One 
> implication of this is that calling dbus_shutdown() from a library is almost certainly wrong, since you don't know what
> the rest of the app is up to. 

Calling from a library is exactly what is going on here, so we will not be able to fix this.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.