Bug 1799091 - python35: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f32
Summary: python35: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f32
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python35
Version: 32
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Marcel Plch
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1797052
Blocks: F32FTBFS
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-02-06 15:37 UTC by Fedora Release Engineering
Modified: 2020-03-05 09:36 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-03-05 09:36:00 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
build.log (32.00 KB, text/plain)
2020-02-06 15:37 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering
no flags Details
root.log (32.00 KB, text/plain)
2020-02-06 15:37 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering
no flags Details
state.log (978 bytes, text/plain)
2020-02-06 15:37 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering
no flags Details

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-06 15:37:09 UTC
python35 failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f32

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41257506


For details on the mass rebuild see:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Please fix python35 at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to
ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks,
python35 will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 33,
python35 will be retired, if it still fails to build.

For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source

Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-06 15:37:16 UTC
Created attachment 1658268 [details]
build.log

file build.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes

Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-06 15:37:23 UTC
Created attachment 1658269 [details]
root.log

file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes

Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-06 15:37:24 UTC
Created attachment 1658270 [details]
state.log

Comment 4 Ben Cotton 2020-02-11 17:13:19 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle.
Changing version to 32.

Comment 5 Miro Hrončok 2020-02-13 13:40:46 UTC
AArch64 is bz1797052, but other architectures hang: armv7hl, x86_64, s390x

Comment 6 Victor Stinner 2020-02-13 15:30:40 UTC
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41257506
> AArch64 is bz1797052, but other architectures hang: armv7hl, x86_64, s390x

armv7hl, x86_64, s390x all hang on "test_sigsegv (test.test_faulthandler.FaultHandlerTests) ... ok".

GCC 10 miscompiles faulthandler._stack_overflow():
https://bugs.python.org/issue38965

And it has been fixed in master:

"bpo-38965: Fix faulthandler._stack_overflow() on GCC 10 (GH-17467)"
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/8b787964e0a647caa0558b7c29ae501470d727d9

It's the same bug than bz#1799090 (python34) and bz#1799092 (python36).

I will wait until python36 is fixed before backport to python35: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python36/pull-request/39

Comment 7 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-16 04:29:12 UTC
Dear Maintainer,

your package has not been built successfully in 32. Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. Following the latest policy for such packages [2], your package
will be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks.

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 33 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 31 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/33/Schedule

Comment 8 Victor Stinner 2020-02-17 16:43:30 UTC
I wrote a PR to backport the GCC 10 fix for faulthandler:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python35/pull-request/42

It also backports another fix for faulthandler.register(chain=True).

Comment 9 Miro Hrončok 2020-02-25 17:03:15 UTC
The PR was merged.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.