Bug 1799139 - acpica-tools: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f32
Summary: acpica-tools: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f32
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1863143
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: acpica-tools
Version: 32
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Al Stone
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F32FTBFS
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-02-06 15:55 UTC by Fedora Release Engineering
Modified: 2020-10-21 15:28 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-10-14 17:13:45 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
build.log (26.76 KB, text/plain)
2020-02-06 15:55 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering
no flags Details
root.log (32.00 KB, text/plain)
2020-02-06 15:55 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering
no flags Details
state.log (1020 bytes, text/plain)
2020-02-06 15:55 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering
no flags Details

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-06 15:55:12 UTC
acpica-tools failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f32

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41315685


For details on the mass rebuild see:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Please fix acpica-tools at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to
ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks,
acpica-tools will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 33,
acpica-tools will be retired, if it still fails to build.

For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source

Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-06 15:55:19 UTC
Created attachment 1658381 [details]
build.log

Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-06 15:55:21 UTC
Created attachment 1658382 [details]
root.log

file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes

Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-06 15:55:22 UTC
Created attachment 1658383 [details]
state.log

Comment 4 Ben Cotton 2020-02-11 17:16:21 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle.
Changing version to 32.

Comment 5 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-16 04:28:41 UTC
Dear Maintainer,

your package has not been built successfully in 32. Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. Following the latest policy for such packages [2], your package
will be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks.

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 33 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 31 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/33/Schedule

Comment 6 Al Stone 2020-02-16 20:54:00 UTC
Working on a fix; a new version of the upstream source has also arrived.

Comment 7 Troy Dawson 2020-07-15 15:52:56 UTC
Newer version is building much better.
A scratch build shows that it builds on all arches but s390x.
s390x is only failling on the second batch of tests, run-misc-tests.sh

Here is the output of a scratch build.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47262933

Comment 8 Al Stone 2020-07-15 17:10:53 UTC
(In reply to Troy Dawson from comment #7)
> Newer version is building much better.
> A scratch build shows that it builds on all arches but s390x.
> s390x is only failling on the second batch of tests, run-misc-tests.sh

My last test builds showed a significant number of failures in the first batch of
tests, as well.

> Here is the output of a scratch build.
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47262933

Yeah, s390x is by definition problematic; ACPICA does not support big-endian at all.
The last few upstream revisions have caused a lot of bugs as a result; still working
on the patches to clean that up.

Comment 9 Miro Hrončok 2020-10-14 17:13:45 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1863143 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.