SRPM Name or Url:http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/docbook2X-0.8.5-1.src.rpm Description: docbook2X converts DocBook documents into man pages and Texinfo documents.
Expect a review soon. :-)
I like the package but it fails to build in mock: Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/docbook2X-0.8.5-1.fc4-root-mockbuild error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/info/dir RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/info/dir
An updated version that builds in mock, and with minor fixes is there: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/docbook2X-0.8.5-2.src.rpm rpmlint isn't happy with libxslt as Require, but docbook2X requires xsltproc which is in libxslt.
(In reply to comment #3) > rpmlint isn't happy with libxslt as Require, but docbook2X requires xsltproc > which is in libxslt. Perhaps you could change the dependency from libxslt to /usr/bin/xsltproc then?
(In reply to comment #4) > > Perhaps you could change the dependency from libxslt to /usr/bin/xsltproc then? I think that in this case this it is just a style issue. I don't have any problem with the dependency as it is. :-)
Preliminary review: Review for release 2: * RPM name is OK * Source docbook2X-0.8.5.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Spec file is readable * License is correct * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of docbook2X looks OK it complains about the lib nature of one of its dependencies but in this case it is bogus. * Package follows packaging rules OK * File list of docbook2X looks OK One minor question, since the package searches tidy is there any reason not to BR it? Package is APPROVED.
It searches tidy and xmllint to rebuild the doc, but the doc needs not to be rebuilt, as they are packaged.
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: docbook2X New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 EL-6 Owners: deebs InitialCC: As discussed with Patrice on epel-devel-list, I would like to take ownership of these packages for the EPEL branches only.
cvs done.
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: docbook2X New Branches: EL-6 Owners: deebs InitialCC: Branch for EL-6 does not appear to be created in cvs, have removed the nobranch file from EL-5 branch, please create branch for EL-6. Thanks.
Should be there now.