percona-xtrabackup failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f32 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41320273 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild Please fix percona-xtrabackup at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, percona-xtrabackup will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 33, percona-xtrabackup will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source
Created attachment 1660259 [details] build.log
Created attachment 1660260 [details] root.log file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes
Created attachment 1660261 [details] state.log
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle. Changing version to 32.
Dear Maintainer, your package has not been built successfully in 32. Action is required from you. If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to acknowledge this. Following the latest policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks. A week before the mass branching of Fedora 33 according to the schedule [3], any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 31 will be retired regardless of the status of this bug. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy [2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/33/Schedule
I dropped myself from this package because I changed jobs. Pete, can you take a look?
f32 and rawhide warning: /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/var/cache/dnf/fedora-2d95c80a1fa0a67d/packages/gdb-minimal-9.1-3.fc33.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 9570ff31: NOKEY Public key for gdb-minimal-9.1-3.fc33.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: gdb-minimal-9.1-3.fc33.x86_64 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-32-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-32-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-31-primary Public key for pcre-8.44-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: pcre-8.44-1.fc33.x86_64 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-32-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-32-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-31-primary Public key for redhat-rpm-config-151-1.fc33.noarch.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: redhat-rpm-config-151-1.fc33.noarch GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-32-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-32-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-31-primary Error: GPG check FAILED
Ignore comment #7. It's been a minute since I've used fedpkg and by build/mock host was f29 and stale. :-) However, there does seem to be some subtle issue introduced by the upgrade to cmake-3.17.0
Dear Maintainer, your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 32. Action is required from you. If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to acknowledge this. If you have already fixed this issue, please close this Bugzilla report. Following the policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks (that's on 2020-04-02). A week before the mass branching of Fedora 33 according to the schedule [3], any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 31 will be retired regardless of the status of this bug. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy [2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ [3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-33/f-33-key-tasks.html
Took a look but think there is too much drift with the new versions of cmake and gcc in 31. Like Carl, I don't use this package any longer and am unable to maintain it.
Upstream removed the datasink_buffer definition from xbstream.c (in upstream as xbstream.cc file).
Dear Maintainer, your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 33. Action is required from you. If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to acknowledge this. If you have already fixed this issue, please close this Bugzilla report. Following the policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks (not sooner than 2020-04-02). A week before the mass branching of Fedora 34 according to the schedule [3], any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 32 will be retired regardless of the status of this bug. [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ [2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ [3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-34/f-34-key-tasks.html
Dear Maintainer, your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 34. Action is required from you. If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to acknowledge this. If you have already fixed this issue, please close this Bugzilla report. Following the policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks (not sooner than 2020-04-02). A week before the mass branching of Fedora 35 according to the schedule [3], any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 33 will be retired regardless of the status of this bug. [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ [2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ [3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-35/f-35-key-tasks.html
I am working on an update to the latest upstream version.
I've successfully built the latest version 8.0.14 for f33 but f34 is still failing - probably because of an updated gcc - I need to look deeper into that new ftbfs.
This package has changed maintainer in the Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '32'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 32 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Fedora 32 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2021-05-25. Fedora 32 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 500 days