Just as a placeholder for now. https://github.com/ptitSeb/box86/blob/master/COMPILE.md
I do not see the SRPM and spec file. Did you forget to upload the link or am I missing something?
(In reply to Attila Lakatos from comment #1) > I do not see the SRPM and spec file. Did you forget to upload the link or am > I missing something? First, we need bug #1788327 as a dependency.
This request is mainly a preparation to give a chance to the emulator box86 and to get it into Fedora with packaging: "Most x86 Games need OpenGL, so on ARM platforms, a solution like gl4es is probably needed." https://ameridroid.com/blogs/ameriblogs/how-to-run-x86-linux-applications-on-arm-linux-with-box86
Well, I'd need real hardware to seriously test this with. Can someone suggest anything, maybe NanoPi?
I hid this review from a review listing. Once your package is ready, delete the "NotReady" word from a whiteboard field.
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #5) > I hid this review from a review listing. Once your package is ready, delete > the "NotReady" word from a whiteboard field. Thanks for your interest. Sorry for the long delay to provide anything, currently too busy with other things…
Copied over from bug #1788327 (rewiew GL4ES): (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #10) > (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #3) > > Thanks for the hints. I'll continue asap due to limited time. > > > > This request is mainly a preparation to give to the emulator box86 a chance > > and to get into Fedora with packaging: > > "Most x86 Games need OpenGL, so on ARM platforms, a solution like gl4es is > > probably needed." > > https://ameridroid.com/blogs/ameriblogs/how-to-run-x86-linux-applications-on- > > arm-linux-with-box86 > > As Fedora is concerned, arm (and aarch64) FLOSS drivers are using mesa and > plain libGL already. > > The only use case where this would be useful would be the PI downstream > driver (not provided by Fedora) or Mali drivers (not provided by Fedora), > and few others. > So if you want box86 on arm with plain libGL and the related mesa drivers > (vc4/v3d for PI and lima for Mali), nothing hold. > > If you are interested in downstream drivers for PI, then I'm trying to > "federate" various userspace in a dedicated rpi namespace in rpmfusion. > The reason why it has to be dedicated is because a ffmpeg built with bcmhost > enabled (PI downstream driver) would make the whole build PI specific. So my > guess is that gl4es, once built with -DBCMHOST=1 would be also specific and > not useful at all on Lima cases and others. > > So that's the reason why I expect this build to be on copr. As I don't > expect a generic build to be anything useful. > At least can you submit a box86 review, so we can any if anything hold ?
New review started in another request, see bug #1901665. (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #5) > I hid this review from a review listing. Once your package is ready, delete > the "NotReady" word from a whiteboard field. Anyways, thanks so far for your interest. See bug #1788327 for more details about continuation plans. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1901665 ***