RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1801605 - [Intel 7.9][VROC] Update mdadm to the latest upstream version
Summary: [Intel 7.9][VROC] Update mdadm to the latest upstream version
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: mdadm
Version: 7.9
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: 7.9
Assignee: XiaoNi
QA Contact: Fine Fan
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1771324 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-02-11 10:33 UTC by Mariusz Tkaczyk
Modified: 2020-09-29 20:16 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version: mdadm-4.1-6.el7
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-09-29 20:16:25 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2020:3976 0 None None None 2020-09-29 20:16:29 UTC

Description Mariusz Tkaczyk 2020-02-11 10:33:56 UTC
1. Feature Overview:
 a) Name of feature:
Update mdadm to the latest upstream version.

 b) Feature Description: 
Mdadm is an application that can be used to control Linux MD devices.
It enables Intel Rapid Storage Technology Enterprise on Linux by providing external IMSM metadata handlers for MD RAID.

2. Feature Details:
New version of mdadm may contain following features:
- support for second volume size
- data offset for each volume
- bugfixes

 a) Architectures:
64-bit Intel EM64T/AMD64

 b) Bugzilla Dependencies:

 c) Drivers or hardware dependencies:
- Any RAID supporting Intel HW platforms can be used, e.g. ICH9, ICH10, Ibexpeak, Patsburg, Wellsburg, Lewisburg
- MD-RAID driver
- VMD driver

 d) Upstream acceptance information: 
mdadm’s extensions including features above are in active development. Final version will be included in Jes Sorensen's GIT repository:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/mdadm/mdadm.git

Pull request will be triggered on this Bugzilla.

Intel can come back with specific commit requests if needed.

 e) External links:

 f) Severity (H,M,L):
Medium
 g) Feature Needed by:

3. Business Justification:
 a) Why is this feature needed?

 b) What hardware does this enable?

 c) Business impact?

 d) Other business drivers:

4. Primary contact at Red Hat, email, phone (chat)
     Don Bayly
     dbayly

5. Primary contact at Partner, email, phone (chat)
     Pragyan Pathi
     pragyansri.pathi

Comment 3 XiaoNi 2020-04-21 06:27:49 UTC
Hi Mariusz

Do you mind removing FutureFeature from keywords. There is no big feature. 

Thanks
Xiao

Comment 4 Mariusz Tkaczyk 2020-04-21 07:00:56 UTC
Hi Xiao,
Done.

Thanks
Mariusz

Comment 6 XiaoNi 2020-04-21 07:16:25 UTC
(In reply to Mariusz Tkaczyk from comment #4)
> Hi Xiao,
> Done.
> 
> Thanks
> Mariusz

Hi Mariusz

I mean removing FutureFeature keyword rather than adding it.

Comment 7 XiaoNi 2020-04-21 07:18:46 UTC
It looks like you remove it. But it add it back again automatically.

Comment 8 XiaoNi 2020-04-21 07:20:08 UTC
Remove FutureFeature from keyword and remove FEAT from subject

Comment 11 XiaoNi 2020-05-14 02:13:49 UTC
*** Bug 1771324 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 17 XiaoNi 2020-05-27 09:02:21 UTC
Hi Fine

It's OK to move it to VERIFIED after regression test. 

Thanks
Xiao

Comment 19 errata-xmlrpc 2020-09-29 20:16:25 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (mdadm bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:3976


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.