Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-gopkg-redis-6.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-gopkg-redis-6-6.15.7-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Type-safe Redis client for Golang. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo
Seems to be BSD and ASL 2.0. Can you not run tests like in golang-gopkg-redis-2? Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla upstream sources. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License", "Apache License (v2.0)". 66 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in 1801881-golang-gopkg-redis-6/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [?]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: golang-gopkg-redis-6-6.15.7-1.fc33.src.rpm golang-gopkg-redis-6.src: W: no-%build-section golang-gopkg-redis-6.src: E: specfile-error warning: -u use in %forgemeta is deprecated, use -z instead to select a separate set of rpm variables! 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- Cannot parse rpmlint output: Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/go-redis/redis/archive/v6.15.7/redis-6.15.7.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : d43633745dd0426338c06077773203c41b20975a663cfdab0cd6f54ed65289bc CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : d43633745dd0426338c06077773203c41b20975a663cfdab0cd6f54ed65289bc Requires -------- Provides -------- Generated by fedora-review 0.7.4 (54fa030) last change: 2019-12-07 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1801881 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: C/C++, Haskell, Java, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Python, PHP, Perl, R, fonts Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
New Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-gopkg-redis-6.spec New SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-gopkg-redis-6-6.15.7-1.fc33.src.rpm
Testing is a mess, I reported one bug upstream but other arches are no better: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42116621
Approved. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla upstream sources. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License", "Apache License (v2.0)". 66 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in 1801881-golang-gopkg-redis-6/licensecheck.txt [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [?]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: golang-gopkg-redis-6-6.15.7-1.fc33.src.rpm golang-gopkg-redis-6.src: W: no-%build-section golang-gopkg-redis-6.src: E: specfile-error warning: -u use in %forgemeta is deprecated, use -z instead to select a separate set of rpm variables! 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- compat-golang-github-redis-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gopkg -> go pkg, go-pkg, GOP compat-golang-github-redis-devel.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided golang-github-redis-devel compat-golang-github-redis-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation compat-golang-github-redis-devel.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/go-redis/redis ../../gopkg.in/redis.v6 golang-gopkg-redis-6.src: W: no-%build-section golang-gopkg-redis-6.src: E: specfile-error warning: -u use in %forgemeta is deprecated, use -z instead to select a separate set of rpm variables! golang-gopkg-redis-6-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/gopkg.in/redis.v6/.goipath 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/go-redis/redis/archive/v6.15.7/redis-6.15.7.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : d43633745dd0426338c06077773203c41b20975a663cfdab0cd6f54ed65289bc CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : d43633745dd0426338c06077773203c41b20975a663cfdab0cd6f54ed65289bc Requires -------- golang-gopkg-redis-6-devel-6.15.7-1.fc33.noarch: go-filesystem rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsZstd) <= 5.4.18-1 compat-golang-github-redis-devel-6.15.7-1.fc33.noarch: go-filesystem golang-ipath(gopkg.in/redis.v6) = 6.15.7-1.fc33 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsZstd) <= 5.4.18-1 Provides -------- golang-gopkg-redis-6-devel-6.15.7-1.fc33.noarch: golang(gopkg.in/redis.v6) = 6.15.7-1.fc33 golang(gopkg.in/redis.v6/internal) = 6.15.7-1.fc33 golang(gopkg.in/redis.v6/internal/consistenthash) = 6.15.7-1.fc33 golang(gopkg.in/redis.v6/internal/hashtag) = 6.15.7-1.fc33 golang(gopkg.in/redis.v6/internal/pool) = 6.15.7-1.fc33 golang(gopkg.in/redis.v6/internal/proto) = 6.15.7-1.fc33 golang(gopkg.in/redis.v6/internal/util) = 6.15.7-1.fc33 golang-gopkg-redis-6-devel = 6.15.7-1.fc33 golang-ipath(gopkg.in/redis.v6) = 6.15.7-1.fc33 compat-golang-github-redis-devel-6.15.7-1.fc33.noarch: compat-golang-github-redis-devel = 6.15.7-1.fc33 golang(github.com/go-redis/redis) = 6.15.7-1.fc33 golang(github.com/go-redis/redis/internal) = 6.15.7-1.fc33 golang(github.com/go-redis/redis/internal/consistenthash) = 6.15.7-1.fc33 golang(github.com/go-redis/redis/internal/hashtag) = 6.15.7-1.fc33 golang(github.com/go-redis/redis/internal/pool) = 6.15.7-1.fc33 golang(github.com/go-redis/redis/internal/proto) = 6.15.7-1.fc33 golang(github.com/go-redis/redis/internal/util) = 6.15.7-1.fc33 golang-symlink(github.com/go-redis/redis) = 6.15.7-1.fc33 Generated by fedora-review 0.7.5 (5fa5b7e) last change: 2020-02-16 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1801881 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Perl, Python, R, C/C++, Haskell, SugarActivity, fonts, Ocaml, Java, PHP Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-gopkg-redis-6
FEDORA-2020-9b96988b10 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-9b96988b10
FEDORA-2020-93a27eb692 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-93a27eb692
golang-gopkg-redis-6-6.15.7-1.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-9b96988b10
golang-gopkg-redis-6-6.15.7-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-93a27eb692
golang-gopkg-redis-6-6.15.7-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
golang-gopkg-redis-6-6.15.7-1.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.