Bug 1802094 - python-certbot-dns-sakuracloud fails to build with Python 3.9: missing dependency on mock
Summary: python-certbot-dns-sakuracloud fails to build with Python 3.9: missing depend...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-certbot-dns-sakuracloud
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Felix Schwarz
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: PYTHON39
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-02-12 11:02 UTC by Miro Hrončok
Modified: 2020-03-05 08:13 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-03-05 08:13:28 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Miro Hrončok 2020-02-12 11:02:58 UTC
python-certbot-dns-sakuracloud fails to build with Python 3.9.0a3.

+ /usr/bin/python3 setup.py test
...
error: Could not find suitable distribution for Requirement.parse('mock')

Sounds like a missing dependency on mock. Could it use unittest.mock on Python 3 instead?


For the build logs, see:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.9/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01236688-python-certbot-dns-sakuracloud/

For all our attempts to build python-certbot-dns-sakuracloud with Python 3.9, see:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.9/package/python-certbot-dns-sakuracloud/

Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr. You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.9:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.9/

Let us know here if you have any questions.

Python 3.9 will be included in Fedora 33. To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with early pre-releases of Python 3.9.
A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires), so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon.
We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.