Bug 1802153 - Review Request: tagsoup - A SAX-compliant HTML parser written in Java
Summary: Review Request: tagsoup - A SAX-compliant HTML parser written in Java
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Marián Konček
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1787725
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-02-12 13:35 UTC by jiri vanek
Modified: 2020-02-14 09:32 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-02-14 09:32:48 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
mkoncek: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description jiri vanek 2020-02-12 13:35:24 UTC
Spec URL: https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/tagsoup/tagsoup.spec
SRPM URL: https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/tagsoup/tagsoup-1.2.1-src.zip
Description: 
TagSoup is a SAX-compliant parser written in Java that, instead of
parsing well-formed or valid XML, parses HTML as it is found in the wild: nasty
and brutish, though quite often far from short. TagSoup is designed for people
who have to process this stuff using some semblance of a rational application
design. By providing a SAX interface, it allows standard XML tools to be
applied to even the worst HTML.

Fedora Account System Username: jvanek

tagsoup was orphaned three months ago, and retired six weeks ago. This review to put it back is based on latests bits. I will maintain it, as icedtea-web is only one eyed without it

Comment 1 jiri vanek 2020-02-12 13:36:43 UTC
Spec URL: https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/tagsoup/tagsoup.spec
SRPM URL: https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/tagsoup/tagsoup-1.2.1-18.fc32.src.rpm

builds and run fine on f32/master

Comment 2 jiri vanek 2020-02-12 14:05:24 UTC
Self review run at: https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/tagsoup/self-review/

Comment 3 Marián Konček 2020-02-12 14:33:51 UTC
This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are
also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla:
- Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't such
  a list, create one.
- Add your own remarks to the template checks.
- Add new lines marked [!] or [?] when you discover new things not
  listed by fedora-review.
- Change or remove any text in the template which is plain wrong. In this
  case you could also file a bug against fedora-review
- Remove the "[ ] Manual check required", you will not have any such lines
  in what you paste.
- Remove attachments which you deem not really useful (the rpmlint
  ones are mandatory, though)
- Remove this text



Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- This seems like a Java package, please install fedora-review-plugin-java
  to get additional checks
- Package does not use a name that already exists.
  Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check
  https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tagsoup
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License (v2.0)",
     "Apache License (v2.0)", "Apache License", "Apache License (v2.0) GPL
     (v2 or later)". 8 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in
     /home/jvanek/git/tagsoup/master/1802153-tagsoup/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
     /usr/share/javadoc/tagsoup(Failed, locale,, set, C, defaulting, to),
     /usr/share/javadoc/tagsoup/org(Failed, locale,, set, C, defaulting,
     to), /usr/share/javadoc/tagsoup/org/ccil(Failed, locale,, set, C,
     defaulting, to), /usr/share/javadoc/tagsoup/org/ccil/cowan(Failed,
     locale,, set, C, defaulting, to),
     /usr/share/javadoc/tagsoup/org/ccil/cowan/tagsoup(Failed, locale,,
     set, C, defaulting, to),
     /usr/share/javadoc/tagsoup/org/ccil/cowan/tagsoup/class-use(Failed,
     locale,, set, C, defaulting, to),
     /usr/share/javadoc/tagsoup/org/ccil/cowan/tagsoup/jaxp(Failed,
     locale,, set, C, defaulting, to),
     /usr/share/javadoc/tagsoup/org/ccil/cowan/tagsoup/jaxp/class-
     use(Failed, locale,, set, C, defaulting, to),
     /usr/share/licenses/tagsoup-javadoc(Failed, locale,, set, C,
     defaulting, to), /usr/share/doc/tagsoup(Failed, locale,, set, C,
     defaulting, to), /usr/share/licenses/tagsoup(Failed, locale,, set, C,
     defaulting, to)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
     justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: tagsoup-1.2.1-18.fc32.noarch.rpm
          tagsoup-javadoc-1.2.1-18.fc32.noarch.rpm
          tagsoup-1.2.1-18.fc32.src.rpm
tagsoup.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/tagsoup/README
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
	LANGUAGE = (unset),
	LC_ALL = (unset),
	LC_CTYPE = "C.UTF-8",
	LANG = "en_US.utf8"
    are supported and installed on your system.
perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
	LANGUAGE = (unset),
	LC_ALL = (unset),
	LC_CTYPE = "C.UTF-8",
	LANG = "en_US.utf8"
    are supported and installed on your system.
perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").
tagsoup.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan/XML/tagsoup/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
tagsoup.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/tagsoup/README
tagsoup-javadoc.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan/XML/tagsoup/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.



Source checksums
----------------
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/ccil/cowan/tagsoup/tagsoup/1.2.1/tagsoup-1.2.1.pom :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 5e3acd4da65e4e443178b3aacaa708e65435916dad16c4fe1e73b5ecfb388a77
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 5e3acd4da65e4e443178b3aacaa708e65435916dad16c4fe1e73b5ecfb388a77
http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan/XML/tagsoup/tagsoup-1.2.1-src.zip :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : fe4bb031f2c62461337afe81f8f70df463dc5edb39bd4145c002f6d10a891ece
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : fe4bb031f2c62461337afe81f8f70df463dc5edb39bd4145c002f6d10a891ece


Requires
--------
tagsoup (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    java-headless
    javapackages-filesystem

tagsoup-javadoc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    javapackages-filesystem
    jpackage-utils



Provides
--------
tagsoup:
    mvn(org.ccil.cowan.tagsoup:tagsoup)
    mvn(org.ccil.cowan.tagsoup:tagsoup:pom:)
    tagsoup

tagsoup-javadoc:
    tagsoup-javadoc



Generated by fedora-review 0.7.4 (54fa030) last change: 2019-12-07
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1802153
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Java, Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Python, C/C++, Perl, PHP, R, fonts, Ocaml, SugarActivity, Haskell
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.