Description of problem: When we launch a threaded application as a child of an
"xterm -e" command on RHEL 4 Update 1 and Update 2, the process exits
immediately after the first thread exit.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
kernel-2.6.9-11.EL and kernel-2.6.9-22.EL

How reproducible:
Everytime

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run test program under "xterm -hold -e"
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
Test program prematurely exits immediately after first child thread exits.

Expected results:
Test program should run to completion.

Additional info:

When we launch a threaded application as a child of an "xterm -e" command on
RHEL 4 Update 1 and Update 2, the process exits immediately after the first
thread exit. This occurs with applications built on RHEL 3 Update 4 as well as
ones built on RHEL 4 Update 1. We have seen this on i386 and x86_64 platforms.

If the applications are launched from a command-line or from a script or with
"execv" from another program, they do NOT prematurely exit. If the applications
built on RHEL 3 Update 4 are launched as a child of an "xterm -e" command on
RHEL 3 Update 4, they do NOT prematurely exit. The premature exit only happens
when launching an application as a child of an "xterm -e" command on RHEL 4
Update 1 and Update 2.

We have debugged this issue as far as we can. When "xterm -e" is used to run
applications, "xterm -e" is the session leader and when a thread in the child
application exits, the kernel sends a SIGHUP to the child. The SIGHUP causes the
child process to exit unless SIGHUP signals are specifically handled or set to
SIG_IGN by the application.

The way "xterm" sets up it session and launches the child process has not
changed between xterm-175 in the RHEL 3 release and xterm-192 in the RHEL 4
release. The difference in thread exit handling between RHEL 3 and RHEL 4 is
probably in the thread exit handling by the kernel. In RHEL 4 if the application
is not the session leader and a thread exits, the kernel sends a SIGHUP and if
the application is the session leader and a thread exits, no SIGHUP is sent.

Our work-around has been to set SIGHUP signal handling to SIG_IGN. We have
noticed that this work-around may cause a child process not to exit when its
parent dies. Fortunately we have very few instances where this can occur and
where it does occur application work-flow is not seriously affected.

This issue also appears to be a regression. A user group thread at Hull Linux
User Group -> Kernel Talk described this(or a very very similar) issue in
October of 2004. The thread was titled "NPTL: Parent thread receives SIGHUP when
child thread terminates?" and can be found at

http://www.thisishull.net/showthread.php?t=50930&highlight=NPTL

Roland McGrath published a fix for this issue in that user group thread. Has
this bug crept back into the 2.6 kernel or are we seeing something else?

We have a test program which demonstrates this issue.

Compile the program with

gcc -pthread -o thread_test1 thread_test1.c

On an RHEL 4 U1 or U2 system, run the program from the command-line and you will
see that threads are created and exited normally and the program runs to normal
completion.

Run the program with "xterm -hold -e thread_test1" and you will see that the
process exits after the first thread exit.

If you add an argument to thread_test1, it sets a signal handler for SIGHUP.
Running "xterm -hold -e thread_test1 sig" you will see a SIGHUP immediately
after the first tread exit and the program runs to normal completion.