Bug 1804921 - ROKS: prevent etcd operator from being applied by CVO
Summary: ROKS: prevent etcd operator from being applied by CVO
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Etcd Operator
Version: 4.4
Hardware: All
OS: All
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.5.0
Assignee: Cesar Wong
QA Contact: ge liu
URL:
Whiteboard: IBMROKS
Depends On:
Blocks: 1805241
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-02-19 21:33 UTC by Cesar Wong
Modified: 2020-07-13 17:16 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1805241 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-07-13 17:16:20 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github openshift cluster-etcd-operator pull 172 0 None closed Bug 1804921: Exclude etcd operator from hosted control plane deployments 2020-06-23 08:38:13 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2020:2409 0 None None None 2020-07-13 17:16:49 UTC

Description Cesar Wong 2020-02-19 21:33:22 UTC 
Description of problem:
The etcd operator is getting applied by CVO and showing up as a failed clusteroperator in a hosted control plane deployment. The operator should not be present.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
v4.4

How reproducible:
always
Comment 3 ge liu 2020-03-24 10:12:54 UTC 
No regression err with 4.4.0-0.nightly-2020-03-23-115620.
Comment 4 ge liu 2020-03-24 10:15:47 UTC 
typo of comment3, the right version is: 4.5.0-0.nightly-2020-03-20-200807
Comment 5 Cesar Wong 2020-03-24 15:03:44 UTC 
verified on ROKS side with 4.5.0-0.nightly-2020-03-20-200807
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2020-07-13 17:16:20 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:2409
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.