Bug 1805926 - Review Request: sil-mondulkiri-extra-fonts - Extra Khmer script font families from the SIL Mondulkiri project
Summary: Review Request: sil-mondulkiri-extra-fonts - Extra Khmer script font familie...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Parag AN(पराग)
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-02-21 17:36 UTC by Nicolas Mailhot
Modified: 2020-02-25 00:02 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-02-25 00:02:12 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
panemade: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Nicolas Mailhot 2020-02-21 17:36:54 UTC
Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nim/fonts-rpm-macros/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01240874-sil-mondulkiri-extra-fonts/sil-mondulkiri-extra-fonts.spec

SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nim/fonts-rpm-macros/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01240874-sil-mondulkiri-extra-fonts/sil-mondulkiri-extra-fonts-5.300-1.fc33.src.rpm

Description:
The Mondulkiri font families provide Unicode support for the Khmer script. “Mondulkiri” and “Ratanakiri” are the names of two provinces in north-eastern Cambodia, Busra and Oureang are names of places in Mondulkiri province.

Fedora Account System Username: nim


One of SIL’s Non-Roman Script Initiative font families
https://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=Home

SIL is a specialist of rare human scripts and contributes its expertise to the Unicode consortium. The objective is to get 100% of SIL’s font catalog in Fedora to improve our i18n coverage.

Due to $#@= variations on how SIL publishes its fonts, the spec uses some SIL-specific macros to hide those variations and limit the changes between the specs of SIL fonts.



The packaging conforms to https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/935
as approved by FPC on 2020-02-13.

It is one of the test packages that were used to refine the new packaging guidelines
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nim/fonts-rpm-macros/

The new fonts packaging build chain is now live in koji. For example:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1468243

If the review is fast enough the package may make the FC32 100% Code Complete Deadline (2020-02-25)
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-32/f-32-key-tasks.html

Comment 1 Parag AN(पराग) 2020-02-23 08:43:37 UTC
Review:

Not going for full package review.

This package follows new fonts packaging guidelines.

Rpmlint
-------
sil-busra-bunong-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US coengs -> coverings
sil-busra-diagnostic-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xspace -> space, x space
sil-busra-diagnostic-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US coengs -> coverings
sil-busra-dot-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codepoint -> code point, code-point, codependent
sil-busra-moe-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US coeng -> conger
sil-mondulkiri-extra-fonts-all.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metapackage -> meta package, meta-package, prepackage
sil-mondulkiri-extra-fonts-all.noarch: W: no-documentation
sil-mondulkiri-extra-fonts-doc.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C sil-mondulkiri-extra-fonts optional documentation files
sil-mondulkiri-extra-fonts-doc.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C This package provides optional documentation files shipped with sil-mondulkiri-extra-fonts.
sil-ratanakiri-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US coengs -> coverings
sil-ratanakiri-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US coeng -> conger
12 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings.


Source checksums
----------------
https://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/render_download.php?format=file&media_id=Mondulkiri-5.300&filename=Mondulkiri-5.300.zip#/Mondulkiri-5.300.zip :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 4ff38760e48f3185c515088d91bc9e6a17402cbb3be316c06681c231db580f88
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 4ff38760e48f3185c515088d91bc9e6a17402cbb3be316c06681c231db580f88



All other things like license, config, metainfo files looks good.

Issues:
1) Fix Summary not capitalized and description not wrapped to 80 characters.
2) fedora-review failed to install generated packages in mock. But let's not block this review here. Tested manually installing generated packages. Working fine.

APPROVED.

Comment 2 Nicolas Mailhot 2020-02-23 11:33:15 UTC
Thanks for the review!

I fixed the spelling bits rpmlint did not like in the macro templates (not sure this is worth a new release)
https://pagure.io/fonts-rpm-macros/c/5f50c715c3b6a3dabb7371d33e7c4fd9e4e12b7c

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/22385

Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2020-02-24 14:45:16 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sil-mondulkiri-extra-fonts

Comment 4 Nicolas Mailhot 2020-02-25 00:02:12 UTC
Done for F32 & F33. Thanks Parag and Gwyn.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.