Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1809598

Summary: libatomic.a, libatomic.so is missing for gcc-toolset-9 (x86_64)
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: Christian Hägele <haegele>
Component: gcc-toolset-9Assignee: Marek Polacek <mpolacek>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Alexandra Petlanová Hájková <ahajkova>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 8.1CC: ahajkova, haegele, jakub, law, lmiksik, marcel.raad, mcermak, mjtrangoni, mnewsome, mpolacek
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: 8.0Flags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-04-28 15:58:37 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File to reproduce problem none

Description Christian Hägele 2020-03-03 13:05:36 UTC
Created attachment 1667191 [details]
File to reproduce problem

Description of problem:
libatomic.a, libatomic.so is missing for gcc-toolset-9 (x86_64)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gcc (GCC) 9.1.1 20190605 (Red Hat 9.1.1-2)

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. See attached file "atomic_test.cpp"
2. Try to compile with system-compiler: g++ atomic_test.cpp -latomic (works)
3. Try to compile with gcc-toolset-9: scl enable gcc-toolset-9 'g++ atomic_test.cpp -latomic'

Actual results:
Compiling with System-Compiler works. Compiling with gcc-toolset-9 gives error: /opt/rh/gcc-toolset-9/root/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -latomic

Expected results:
The code should also compile and link with the gcc-toolset-9.

Additional info:
When I create a symlink in /opt/rh/gcc-toolset-9/root/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/9/ to the file from the system-compiler it works.
These are the command I executed for my workaround:
sudo ln -s /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/8/libatomic.so /opt/rh/gcc-toolset-9/root/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/9/libatomic.so
sudo ln -s /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/8/libatomic.a /opt/rh/gcc-toolset-9/root/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/9/libatomic.a

Comment 1 Marek Polacek 2020-03-11 01:41:19 UTC
This happens because you don't have gcc-toolset-9-libatomic-devel installed.  But I see that that package wasn't shipped for some reason, which is a problem that needs to be fixed, sorry about that.

Comment 12 Marek Polacek 2020-03-25 04:01:24 UTC
Clearing needinfo.

Comment 13 Mario Trangoni 2020-04-03 09:40:10 UTC
Any ETAs on when is this landing on UBI8 images?

Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2020-04-28 15:58:37 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:1683